Jalen Ramsey watch party

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

dang

Legend
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
8,260
Then you really need to read thru the thread. He's not a FA, nor will he be one. He's got 21+ mill guaranteed this season
Actually I recommend you reread DzRams post that I responded to. A question was asked which I replied to. I’m sticking with my answer. It’s just my opinion of what he is worth.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
36,084
Name
Stu
If he plays outside, it’ll take away snaps from either Ahkello Witherspoon or Darious Williams.
I would think it would actually take more snaps from Durant. Wasn’t he being used almost exclusively on the outside toward the end of the season?
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,218
Strange that they seem so intent on moving him. They didn't even try the "he wants out but we don't have any intention" thing like must orgs do.
Crazy thing is that if they cant move him, they might opt for the Myles Garrett method. Throw some more money at him to make him realize "he didnt really want to leave, he just wants to play for a team committed to paying him to winning"
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,218
Actually I recommend you reread DzRams post that I responded to. A question was asked which I replied to. I’m sticking with my answer. It’s just my opinion of what he is worth.
He was referring to a trade, you just said you werent.
So what are you referring to?
 

dang

Legend
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
8,260
He was referring to a trade, you just said you werent.
So what are you referring to?
RamTs post started with him as waived. It does look like DzRams was referring to a trade. I was referring to $$$ after being waived. Sorry for any confusion.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,218
RamTs post started with him as waived. It does look like DzRams was referring to a trade. I was referring to $$$ after being waived. Sorry for any confusion.
No worries.
I wasnt trying to be condescending, there has been a lot of info posted that folks just ignore. And as also stated, there's no chance they waive him.
Alas....
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
24,641
Crazy thing is that if they cant move him, they might opt for the Myles Garrett method. Throw some more money at him to make him realize "he didnt really want to leave, he just wants to play for a team committed to paying him to winning"

How can they justify giving him more money. He’s the third highest paid cornerback as it is.

It seemed like a big overpay when they gave him that deal. PFF has him as the 10th best corner last year. Considering he’s older than most others on the list, he’s not likely to improve on that ranking.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
24,641
1748465039658.png
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,218
How can they justify giving him more money. He’s the third highest paid cornerback as it is.

It seemed like a big overpay when they gave him that deal. PFF has him as the 10th best corner last year. Considering he’s older than most others on the list, he’s not likely to improve on that ranking.
If they cant trade him, they really cant cut him and take the massive hit that goes with it.
Option 1- Trade him- costs the cap 29 mill over 2 years + whatever additional salary they have to eat, say 10-12 mill. 39-41 mill of dead cap over 2 years and not have the player
Option 2- Cutting him, costs 49 mill of cap space over 2 years and not have the player

So while it sounds crazy, why not throw him a bone?
Give him another 5-7 mill guaranteed, he agrees, they're all happy in Dolphinland and Ramsey plays his ass off knowing he's basically playing for his next contract
Costs the '25 Cap 23-27 mill after escalators
Go in to '26 when he could be cut for 18 mill of dead cap
So they get a potential All-Pro year of play from him and he costs 42-45 mill over 2 years which is less than a cut and potentially the same as a trade
 

Allen2McVay

Legend
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
9,987
Name
Jim
If they cant trade him, they really cant cut him and take the massive hit that goes with it.
Just to build on Dieter's comment above.

The Dolphins have a $16.7M cap hit for Ramsey in 2025.

Per OTC, if Miami cuts him (before OR after June 1st) ... OR, if Miami trades him before June 1st ... the Dolphins' 2025 cap hit for Ramsey will Greatly INCREASE.

Only a POST-June 1st trade would offer Miami some cap relief.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
36,084
Name
Stu
So how is it that we cut Kupp and Seattle was on the hook for part of his contract and the same wouldn't apply to Ramsey? We got some (not a lot) cap relief from Seattle if I recall correctly. Wouldn't Miami get some level of cap relief from whatever team signed Ramsey after being cut?
 

Allen2McVay

Legend
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
9,987
Name
Jim
So how is it that we cut Kupp and Seattle was on the hook for part of his contract and the same wouldn't apply to Ramsey? We got some (not a lot) cap relief from Seattle if I recall correctly. Wouldn't Miami get some level of cap relief from whatever team signed Ramsey after being cut?

I don't know that the Rams got any cap relief by Seattle signing Kupp.

Kupp was just an unrestricted free agent when he signed with Seattle. No cap implications to the Rams. Believe that was the case.

Kupp will be on the Rams' 2025 cap for $22.3M ... per both OTC and Spotrac
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
43,555
So how is it that we cut Kupp and Seattle was on the hook for part of his contract and the same wouldn't apply to Ramsey? We got some (not a lot) cap relief from Seattle if I recall correctly. Wouldn't Miami get some level of cap relief from whatever team signed Ramsey after being cut?
Contracts will often have offset language in the contracts that if a player is cut they can redeem a certain amount of the dead cap based on what the player signs for with the new team.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
36,084
Name
Stu
Contracts will often have offset language in the contracts that if a player is cut they can redeem a certain amount of the dead cap based on what the player signs for with the new team.
I believe this covers what I was talking about. I can't find it now but somewhere, someone posted an article that said Seattle had to pay part of his salary that went against our cap. I remember that the post was that it was surprising and new information at the time. Maybe the info itself was wrong and I can't find it now.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
36,084
Name
Stu
Apparently, the $12million signing bonus Seattle paid Kupp somehow offset some of what the Rams were due to pay Kupp. I'm still trying to see how or if that affected our cap or if it was just money in the organization's pockets.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
36,084
Name
Stu
This is all I can find. I think I had seen where the cap hit would have been around $25-26 mil and this took it down to 22?


Pastoors confirmed that the $12 million signing bonus that came with Kupp's contract he signed with the Seahawks offset the Rams owing him that in 2025. However, by being released, the remaining money owed to him on his contract prorates to 2025, which means the Rams will, in total, occur a dead money charge of around $22 million this year.
Kupp will be off the salary books next year.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
50,001
Name
Burger man
Ramsey has been durable in his career, his physicality is still there. I don’t want no part of that contract though.