SSI - RRB Benefits ...
Dude - no offense, but shut the fuck up.I’m almost 50 so I listening intently. My time is coming.
50’s are (will be) the greatest decade of your life.
60’s are cool as well.
70’s- not so much.
Dude - no offense, but shut the fuck up.I’m almost 50 so I listening intently. My time is coming.
IMO, Bruss is much better suited for Guard then tackle and 6'5 310lbs is not bad I also believe the reason that Snead prefers that prototype is because they pass block better. It's easier to teach someone to run block, but pass blocking is more of an art.
Now I believe Bruss is more of a natural guard than Edwards so I believe he'll fit well at RG and even offer more in the run game then Corbett did. However, again, I can't disagree with the success because the goal is to keep #9 clean and with the addition of Bruss at RG and only giving up one sack outside, should make his adjustment to the next level, that much easier IMHO.
View attachment 53995
Robert Rochelle & David Long.Yes Hill is a solid piece who is a proven CB.I think the concern was having an extra CB to replace D. Williams.My doubt? I said I felt a lot better about the CB (and S) room since reaquiring Hill and drafting those DBs. Or are you talking about my doubt prior to that?
Our third division game last year was week 10. This has it four weeks earlier. Slight difference but noticable in that the league likes games that matter later in the season. I’d wager at least both Niner games are second half of the schedule. Not a huge criticism just something we’ve seen them switch to in recent years. I wonder if KC wouldn’t be a primetime game but that would likely be the game of the week type national audienceYes. Didn't really hardcore it as far as looking at the International games and eliminating certain things.
As far as your first point, I totally disagree. Very similar as last year in regards to Division games.
Cooper Kupp and of course, Sean McVay himself...Boy it was tough to Coach the Giants back in the 70's.Yeah, the Rams have a number of NFL sons. Lake & Yeast this year. Jefferson. Hopkins. Anybody else?
Someone else mentioned it but it'd allow us to match up better vs our prime NFC challenger, the BUCS and their bitch ass QB Brady
Or collides with a cheerleader and dislocates his shoulder!!Atwell doesn't break-stride, runs through the tunnel and is never heard from again.
And every AFC home game last year was a home game, in their home stadium. NFC played true road games.
Dammit. I meant ‘I keed.‘ Dummy meI keep. Or I shoulda done blue
Yeah I see it that way too. Bruss moves dudes, it's there over and over he's got some power in his game. None of the guys on our depth chart do that very well. Rams need to improve in run blocking and he was targeted for that, and he doesn't give up anything in pass pro either so I can't imagine any of these depth chart dudes giving him a run for it.
Maybe Anchrum. But Bruss is a brute.
We won't lose a home game for a few more years but we can still play road games abroad.Didn’t the Rams have a deal to play overseas almost every year while Sofi was being built so they wouldn’t have to for a while?
Anything can and likely will happen.With Stafford's preference for big targets, it's Harris' job to lose over Atwell. If it's even up or even slightly in Atwell's favor, Harris is the guy. If they make the mistake to let the raw, SPARQ God on the PS, some team will snatch him up in a NY minute
We didn't draft any WRs, so that sixth spot seems to be up for grabs between Harris, Atwell and Powell unless Powell makes it as a ST specialist alone...
Aahh, the ol' spadger! Haven't heard that term in ages.
I don't do it, I just like to read about it. Sorry for the mild hijack.Cool you like D&D and homebrew. You should start a new thread!
Yep. And what I find really funny in all this is the Rams said Bruss was atop their guard board. So they had him over the Pats pick.On the flip side the Rams drafted Bruss 85 spots earlier than the consensus Big Boards. So some teams may have laughed at them.
The effects in 1982 wasn't that bad for that time periodKeep in mind there are 3 versions of The Thing: from 1951, 1982, and 2011.
My Dad (who was born in 1940) said the 1951 Thing was the scariest movie he ever saw (because he was 11 when he saw it).
As for the 2011 remake, I don't know much about it.
But we are all referring to the classic John Carpenter version from 1982. So you have to forgive the old school special effects of course. But if you can appreciate good acting and a tense paranoid thriller... then yea, the 1982 version is a great horror movie.
I hope they are great. I like Pettigrew’s potential but overall it’s a lot of unknown quantityI'm not sure excited is the right word, but I do like the chances for TE/FB Roger Carter & a couple of the Edge DE's.