What does your NFC power rankings look like?
- By Dxmissile
- RAMS / NFL TALK
- 49 Replies
1.Rams
2.Cardinals
3.Bucs
4.9ers
5.Packers
2.Cardinals
3.Bucs
4.9ers
5.Packers
I would have said - I did that on purposeI was like that when I was younger. Took a lot to take me off my feet. One day I was walking through the parking lot at work in the morning. I was talking to a co-worker. Wasn't paying attention and straight into one of the concrete parking bumpers with both feet. Stumbled but did a good job not falling down. I told the co-worker "A lesser man woulda gone down right there". He told me "Maybe, but a better man wouldn't have tripped to begin with".![]()
Eddie Munster mated with an iguana snd had a son named Michael Munster. Eddie was convicted to life in prison for draining the blood/killing 40+ Bolivian male prostitutes. Michael changed his last name to Florio to disassociate with the tarnished Munster name.
Yes sir Philly..
Bad timing and he will be sorely missed if the players in the OLB rotation don't man up until he returns.
Depth chart
In sports, a depth chart, , is used to show the placements of the starting players and the secondary players- with the starter or first-string player listed first, followed by replacement and platoon players.
Generally a starting player will be listed first or on top while a back-up will be listed below. Depth charts also tend to resemble the actual position locations of certain players.
Do the Rams have enough depth to overcome their injuries to starting players in 2021.
I believe they do but I'm not a homer and going to call it a fact.
I love the way Snead and McVay quietly built this team during the offseason.
If these two don't feel comfortable with what they have prior to the trade deadline, they will pull off one of their usual crazy mid season acquisitions to upgrade the roster.
These guys don't lay down and ride it out if they feel a need to add a player.
![]()
It seems that way. And it makes sense.Yeah. Not a whole lot of the crew are even California residents.
How about getting Corbett for a 5th round draft pick?Just a thought we've mentioned and reflected on...
Kenny Young was an afterthought in the Peters trade.
What this organization has done with trading picks for proven vets cannot be done without moves like this in return. Just fantastic ask (I think we asked for him in the trade, no?) and development of the player.
Had a lot to do with AD being injured.Last season's defense was a mirage. #1 defense? In the playoffs the Rams were steamrolled by the Packers.
People went after McVay?
Were those "people" Skip and Florio?
Seems he could do what both of them do, except better...when has lack of first round pick stopped them?Van Jefferson, Tutu Atwell, then Burks? Seems he could do what both of them do.
Add Collins, Marlon Mack and Geno Atkins at vet minimums to climb on board the McVay train.
Agreed. Fields is gonna need time to get his game online. Trotting him out there and using his legs to win you games now is some BS. How many QBs have the Bears fed to the wolves. If they want maximum return on their investment then give him some time to learn the offense so maybe he won't be out of the league in three years due to taking so many hits as a read/option QB.I enjoy Dan Orlovsky, and think he has many good takes.
Not sure I like him calling for Nagy to be fired.
I am certain that his take at the beginning of the above video is weak.
Orlovsky was critical of Nagy not doing more to protect Fields on pass plays and makes this point with two numbers. Said, Fields 'threw the ball 20 times' (Accurate). Then he stated that the Bears 'went with five-man-protection 13 times' (will assume that is also accurate). Orlovsky then made his point that the Bears (Nagy) 'went with 'the minimum protection 13-out-of-20 times' (65%).
When I heard the comment this morning, I said to myself ... "Fields was sacked nine times" ... that's nine additional drop-backs. Then I wondered how many runs out of the pocket Fields had (I believe he just had a couple). Never-the-less, those are also drop-backs; and that increases the number from 20-to-30-plus.
Assuming the Bears were in five-man-protection 13 times (like Orlovsky stated), the percentage of minimal protection schemes on drop-backs is much lower than his 65% ... maybe closer to 40%.
It's not a huge deal but it is sloppy reporting. Orlovsky could have criticized Nagy without using inaccurate numbers.
Why did Orlovsky do it?
Did he have a brain-fart, or was he manipulating the numbers to help make his point?
Either answer is bad.
Maybe I should call for ESPN to fire Dan Orlovsky?!?
I so hated that the AFC east was so poor except for NE.Hard to say, the assumption was the Chiefs window would be open for a while, now that division is looking tough.
The reason the Pats were able to go on so long was the ineptitude of the rest of the division.
The west is a good division but will they stay that way? The Hags may end up in last and I still don’t trust Arizona and who knows if Trey Lance can play? The Rams could end up being the most stable team in the division.
Scouting.View attachment 48080
Someone needs to tell this doris she’s gone to the wrong stadium. What’s she playing at?!
As we all should. 3rd down bombs for Christ's sake.Not that it's statistical or anything but I personally feel a lot more confident this year when we get into any third and 10+ situations than I did last year.