OFFICIAL LA Rams 2025 Cut Thread

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Ground Chuck

Rookie
Joined
Mar 31, 2025
Messages
358
Name
JR
So many receivers are playing great. Makes for very hard cut decisions
We can probably get Presley onto the practice squad, and maybe that other kid that caught the “helmet catch”. Mumpfield at this point does not seem like a lock for #6. And I don’t see that guy from Philly being needed. We don’t need him For returns, I don’t believe.

Presley, heard talking to coach, when he finds out he makes the practice squad-

”Thank you…thank you very much”

-Presley
 
Last edited:

hotanez

NRA Member for Life
Joined
Jun 17, 2014
Messages
7,790
We can probably get Presley onto the practice squad, and maybe that other kid that caught the “helmet catch”. Mumpfield at this point does not seem like a lock for #6. And I don’t see that guy from Philly being needed. We don’t need him For returns, I don’t believe.

Presley, heard talking to coach, when he finds out he makes the practice squad-

”Thank you…thank you very much”

-Presley
Mumpfield is not a lock? my guess is he is.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,762
How many WR they gonna keep? TE? RB? OL?
Over the last 3 years they've kept:
WR/RB/TE- 12
OL-9
And keep in mind they only had 2 QB so even those numbers are carrying an extra player
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
44,028
3 QB
6 WR
3 TE
4 RB seems logical but like Dieter says that will cause one less in another position. OL I'd rather not unless they think a depth guy can stick on the PS. We started last year with 8 OL on the 53 man. With 8 that leaves us 24 players on offense. Take the 3 ST specialists and that leaves 26 on D.

Front 3 you would think is 6 guys like last year.
LB's last year was 10 but I think we're better there this year so I'd go with 9 and that gives us the extra player on offense from last year.
Leaving us with 11 DB's which also could yield a roster spot.
 

gogoat1

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
1,511
Name
Troy
It looks like Stetson will make the 53 and we all hope Lampkin makes it, and Mumfield.................. going to be some tough cuts.
Its a very good problem to have. I have high hopes for the Little Pissed off Bowling Ball with long Orangutan arms.
OK, Clyde sounds like a good nickname for Lampkin.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,762
3 QB
6 WR
3 TE
4 RB seems logical but like Dieter says that will cause one less in another position. OL I'd rather not unless they think a depth guy can stick on the PS. We started last year with 8 OL on the 53 man. With 8 that leaves us 24 players on offense. Take the 3 ST specialists and that leaves 26 on D.
Thats why I left QB out, they are certainly keeping 3
Keeping it simple,
WR/RB/TE- 12
OL-9
Who stays?
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
44,028
Thats why I left QB out, they are certainly keeping 3
Keeping it simple,
WR/RB/TE- 12
OL-9
Who stays?
If it's just 12

RB Williams, Corum and Hunter (Shraeder to the PS)
TE Higbee, Ferguson and Parkinson (try to get Allen to the PS)
WR Adams, Nacua, Atwell, Mumpfield, Whittington and Smith (Smith could be odd man out if they have somebody they love for returns).
 

Ground Chuck

Rookie
Joined
Mar 31, 2025
Messages
358
Name
JR
IMG_4390.gif

@Loyal hitting refresh on this thread, waiting for Reeders name to appear…
 

Pupped

Legend
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
9,138
Name
Pupped
If it's just 12

RB Williams, Corum and Hunter (Shraeder to the PS)
TE Higbee, Ferguson and Parkinson (try to get Allen to the PS)
WR Adams, Nacua, Atwell, Mumpfield, Whittington and Smith (Smith could be odd man out if they have somebody they love for returns).
Smith's not going anywhere, imo. He's been excellent in returns and *seems to have grown a lot as a receiver.

Allen won't make it through to PS, imo. He's absolutely taken a step this offseason.. looks more physical as a blocker and has made a tone of plays in practices as a target.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
44,028
Smith's not going anywhere, imo. He's been excellent in returns and *seems to have grown a lot as a receiver.

Allen won't make it through to PS, imo. He's absolutely taken a step this offseason.. looks more physical as a blocker and has made a tone of plays in practices as a target.
I have Smith in my list. Also nobody knows how this will unfold.
 

thirteen28

I like pizza.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
8,972
Name
Erik
3 QB
6 WR
3 TE
4 RB seems logical but like Dieter says that will cause one less in another position. OL I'd rather not unless they think a depth guy can stick on the PS. We started last year with 8 OL on the 53 man. With 8 that leaves us 24 players on offense. Take the 3 ST specialists and that leaves 26 on D.

Front 3 you would think is 6 guys like last year.
LB's last year was 10 but I think we're better there this year so I'd go with 9 and that gives us the extra player on offense from last year.
Leaving us with 11 DB's which also could yield a roster spot.

Thats why I left QB out, they are certainly keeping 3
Keeping it simple,
WR/RB/TE- 12
OL-9
Who stays?

Dammit, can't they just raise the roster size to 60 already??

Seriously, the union should make something like that conditional in exchange for going to 18 games as the league want to do.
 

DzRams

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
1,898
Name
Desmal M
If it's just 12

RB Williams, Corum and Hunter (Shraeder to the PS)
TE Higbee, Ferguson and Parkinson (try to get Allen to the PS)
WR Adams, Nacua, Atwell, Mumpfield, Whittington and Smith (Smith could be odd man out if they have somebody they love for returns).
Who are the return candidates besides Smith? I could see them going light at WR.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
44,028
Dammit, can't they just raise the roster size to 60 already??

Seriously, the union should make something like that conditional in exchange for going to 18 games as the league want to do.
My hope is they do away with the gameday inactives but there are issues with that.