- Joined
- Mar 29, 2020
- Messages
- 10,279
- Name
- Jim
You're expecting just three TEs on the 53?Don't see any other way
You're expecting just three TEs on the 53?Don't see any other way
You're expecting just three TEs on the 53?
Breaking: Rams give Reeder, Kendrick and Tutu lifetime contracts.
We can probably get Presley onto the practice squad, and maybe that other kid that caught the “helmet catch”. Mumpfield at this point does not seem like a lock for #6. And I don’t see that guy from Philly being needed. We don’t need him For returns, I don’t believe.So many receivers are playing great. Makes for very hard cut decisions
Mumpfield is not a lock? my guess is he is.We can probably get Presley onto the practice squad, and maybe that other kid that caught the “helmet catch”. Mumpfield at this point does not seem like a lock for #6. And I don’t see that guy from Philly being needed. We don’t need him For returns, I don’t believe.
Presley, heard talking to coach, when he finds out he makes the practice squad-
”Thank you…thank you very much”
-Presley
I think he makes the team don’t get me wrong.Mumpfield is not a lock? my guess is he is.
Thats why I left QB out, they are certainly keeping 33 QB
6 WR
3 TE
4 RB seems logical but like Dieter says that will cause one less in another position. OL I'd rather not unless they think a depth guy can stick on the PS. We started last year with 8 OL on the 53 man. With 8 that leaves us 24 players on offense. Take the 3 ST specialists and that leaves 26 on D.
If it's just 12Thats why I left QB out, they are certainly keeping 3
Keeping it simple,
WR/RB/TE- 12
OL-9
Who stays?
Rams longshot rookie just got the clearest sign yet he’s making the team https://ramblinfan.com/los-angeles-...st-sign-yet-he-s-making-team-konata-mumpfieldMumpfield is not a lock? my guess is he is.
Smith's not going anywhere, imo. He's been excellent in returns and *seems to have grown a lot as a receiver.If it's just 12
RB Williams, Corum and Hunter (Shraeder to the PS)
TE Higbee, Ferguson and Parkinson (try to get Allen to the PS)
WR Adams, Nacua, Atwell, Mumpfield, Whittington and Smith (Smith could be odd man out if they have somebody they love for returns).
I have Smith in my list. Also nobody knows how this will unfold.Smith's not going anywhere, imo. He's been excellent in returns and *seems to have grown a lot as a receiver.
Allen won't make it through to PS, imo. He's absolutely taken a step this offseason.. looks more physical as a blocker and has made a tone of plays in practices as a target.
3 QB
6 WR
3 TE
4 RB seems logical but like Dieter says that will cause one less in another position. OL I'd rather not unless they think a depth guy can stick on the PS. We started last year with 8 OL on the 53 man. With 8 that leaves us 24 players on offense. Take the 3 ST specialists and that leaves 26 on D.
Front 3 you would think is 6 guys like last year.
LB's last year was 10 but I think we're better there this year so I'd go with 9 and that gives us the extra player on offense from last year.
Leaving us with 11 DB's which also could yield a roster spot.
Thats why I left QB out, they are certainly keeping 3
Keeping it simple,
WR/RB/TE- 12
OL-9
Who stays?
I deliver hard passes, "because you like that!." ~ CousinsAgreed hard pass.
Who are the return candidates besides Smith? I could see them going light at WR.If it's just 12
RB Williams, Corum and Hunter (Shraeder to the PS)
TE Higbee, Ferguson and Parkinson (try to get Allen to the PS)
WR Adams, Nacua, Atwell, Mumpfield, Whittington and Smith (Smith could be odd man out if they have somebody they love for returns).
My hope is they do away with the gameday inactives but there are issues with that.Dammit, can't they just raise the roster size to 60 already??
Seriously, the union should make something like that conditional in exchange for going to 18 games as the league want to do.