ottoman89
Busch Light slammin, hog farmin, Iowa boy.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2010
- Messages
- 5,027
- Name
- Josh Otto
And Coen knows him well. Levis excelled under him.Seems Levis is under consideration. Stafford is a little iffy with durability.
And Coen knows him well. Levis excelled under him.Seems Levis is under consideration. Stafford is a little iffy with durability.
I agree. He is a huge gamble.i dunno man, he looks like a huge project. everyone was drooling about lance and he flopped so far. richardson is even less experienced isn't he? and has accuracy/mental issues. they have no idea if he'll be any good in the nfl. there was a sneaking suspicion that lamar would be good but teams were too scared to take him high.
.
Maybe Coen knowing him well is the reason he didn’t go in round one. I’m sure some of his NFL connections talked to him about Levis. If Coen wants back in the league then I think he’d be telling them the truth, either way. You don’t make friends by screwing over NFL teams with bad info.And Coen knows him well. Levis excelled under him.
No OL for you! You get small fast guy who won’t get targetsWhat we should do now is to trade down and load up on Oline. But my wanting that badly means that Snead won't do it. So which undersized WR will we pick now?
Which one of those players can play OC??
Rams need an OC. It won't matter what they do if they don't wind up with a decent OC for 2023.
4.7 40 and a 32.5 vertical isn't super athletic but he isn't a stiff either. Gronks's 40 time was 4.68 and he had 33.5 vertical and he turned out ok.I'm saying a prayer he's the one guy we DON'T take. lol. Can't remember the last time a very large and not very fast or quick TE became a significant difference maker. I see this guy as Kyle Brady and, IMO, this team has far bigger needs.
Maybe he's trying to get him to fall to 36 for his friend in McVay. Haha.Maybe Coen knowing him well is the reason he didn’t go in round one. I’m sure some of his NFL connections talked to him about Levis. If Coen wants back in the league then I think he’d be telling them the truth, either way. You don’t make friends by screwing over NFL teams with bad info.
I would totally take that and not think twice about it.I think you won the day 2 Rams mock draft. Congratulations, there is a beer waiting for you somewhere.
Detroit might do it too as there first two picks were a bit mah...
I like the last three. 36 is high for a raw talent like Adeboware.
So that's means Tank Dell...oh the horror! Get your pitchforks out!No OL for you! You get small fast guy who won’t get targets
I'd take Torrence over Avila hands down.Seems like a lot of talent there, I really don’t want a trade down farther than low 40’s if they do it. They have to get a day 1 starter who makes a difference.
Torrence or Avila would be my wants.
Oh I thought you meant #36Thing is, I didn't take him at #36, I took him at #48. Read it again.
Hookers are always better than Levi's. ....what kinda fuckin question is that?Ok....so most on here would despise taking a QB at 36.
So which QB are we taking.
Levi's or Hooker?
I wouldn't trade back too far if they decide to. Gotta be a balance between trading too far back and getting some solid players. I wouldn't necessarily be mad either if we stay out either and pick up a solid player. I'm sure the Rams know who they want to target.When I look at the trade back values.. I just keep my fingers crossed.
I don't know how they get there.. but trading back 20 spots gives them two more picks in the top 120 for sure.... and I'm more than happy with the guys likely available in the mid-late 50's as a starting point.
Quantity AND quality is what I'm hoping for. Less ceiling, much higher floor for the entire draft class.
Ok....so most on here would despise taking a QB at 36.
So which QB are we taking.
Levi's or Hooker?