Lots of criticism Shula. And I agree it looks bad. But one thing that always makes DC tactics hard to assess is, we don't know WHY they are playing the schemes they are. It is possible the Rams were giving the 49ers so much cushion because Shula had 0 trust they could stick with any offensive players otherwise. Just saying. He may have wanted to play closer and take away the middle of the field and short passes, but didn't feel he had the pieces. Particularly as, right after the loss, the Rams announced they would indeed be looking for help in the secondary. And the PFF grades for every single secondary defender - not the be all and end all, for sure - were ugly across the board. To a man. All failing grades.
Having said that, the 49ers were down their 3 best receiving options in Pearsall, Jennings, and Kittle. The Rams secondary was at full health, less Whitherspoon. If you STILL don't feel your secondary can get it done personnel wise in those circumstances, and have to play with overly soft cushions to shield them, you have a serious problem, and are not a Super Bowl roster. Not even close. How do you expect to stop Josh Allen and the Bills' passing attack, if you cannot stop Mac Jones and the 49ers 2nd team offense?
I think it was just poor game planning, as Shula has played it way more aggressively in the past, with the same unit, facing far better WR rooms. Shula has been excellent to date but that was awful.
This unit really misses Witherspoon. But I think we need 1 more good CB even when he is healthy.
This young secondary group is better than they have shown to date. If we want to go anywhere, some of the improvement is going to have to come from internal growth by the young players already in house. I think they can do it. Many of them have flashed. It's a long season.