What does "all-in" mean this time?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
gogoat1 said:
More crazy talk. There is no Elway or Manning in this draft worth giving up all that and gutting our teams future. Trades like you want are what get head coaches and GMs fired.
Your discernment is lacking. In football for sure.
Now I never was a huge Kid Rock guy. His song did go to #1 from his halftime show.
Eric The Great hated it too.

View: https://x.com/TruthJasonLee/status/1976398407595110588
Click to expand...

Did Bad Bunny boink your girlfriend or something? You seem to have a real hardon on against him.
 
  • HaHa
Reactions: duanevalle22
Soul Surfer said:
When did we start allowing political talk and political opinions on ROD?
Click to expand...
I guess that's what happens when you have an artist of Puerto Rican decent do a Super Bowl halftime show in Spanish...... Ruffled a few feathers. :laugh2:

Cant wait for what the NFL has in store for next years Super Bowl halftime show in SoCal ............................................ Hopefully the show will include the Rams as a special guest.
 
I need my "safe space" from all this divisive bullshit going around. ;)

Some times that's why I actually come here. :)
 
dang said:
Did Bad Bunny boink your girlfriend or something? You seem to have a real hardon on against him.
Click to expand...
Screenshot_20260211-174022~2.webp
 
  • HaHa
Reactions: duanevalle22
Please, guys. Enough with the political bullshit on both sides, for serious. It hasn’t been allowed here for more than a decade and a half. It will never, ever be allowed here. If you must talk politics, there are plenty of other sites that allow it, but not this site and especially not on this football sub-server.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: majrleaged, DragonOfBlood and Stl2La
RAMSinLA said:
Why?
Click to expand...
Because of the reason I stated ...
"While Seattle has put a ton of resources into building one of the best defenses in the NFL, the Rams have put a majority of their resources into building one of the NFL’s best offenses."

Per OTC, the Rams 2026 cap allocation for Offense stands at $190M compared to $75M for the Defense.
By comparison, Seattle's 2026 cap allocations is $112M for the Offense, and $121M for the Defense.

The Rams (offensive head coach) are built to have an elite offense ... they have one.
Seattle (defensive head coach) is built to have an elite defense ... they have it.

Things can change over time ... more than one off-season ... but
I don't see the Rams building 'a better defense than the Seahawks' in the next year or two.

I also don't see the Seahawks building a better offense than the Rams as long as Stafford is around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RamFanWA
Pupped said:
The first time around, the Rams threw EVERYTHING at getting the roster to critical mass to win a SB, including a massive amount of draft capital. They had to, they desperately needed difference-makers like Stafford, Ramsey and Miller. This time? They *have* difference-makers on the roster, imo.. in Stafford, Verse and Puka. Their biggest issues are obvious, Corner and overall Special Teams.

I would argue that the "all-in" this time should be more on the financial end.. targeting FAs, especially one prime Corner. I would also consider going after Rasheed Shaheed.. overpriced.. but a perfect fit for this team's needs.

Do not use draft capital in trades unless there's a ridiculous value to be had and they should be looking to bolster the roster's overall talent and depth with the draft and be looking at the longterm as much as the immediate. My plan going into the draft would be using one of the firsts, but trading back with the other with the goal of having at least 6 picks in the first 4 rounds. WR, CB, and OT being the top priorities.. but then S and ILB and Edge. If they draft as well as recent years.. wow.

They've put themselves in the position to push the 2026 roster over the top.. while not sacrificing the future of the team.

Two moves.. converting Davante Adams and releasing Darious Williams.. puts them up to 71 million in space. I assume AT LEAST 10 mil of that goes to a raise for Stafford.. but that leaves A TON of money for some immediate roster help. Both in high-end spots like the two I mentioned.. but also for bargain hunting for those vets who can come in and offer quality depth.
Click to expand...

Not sure what it means or what it's going to look like this time around, but I sure hope it means building a solid foundation for prolonged success and not just a big spurt and then limp for years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pupped
duanevalle22 said:
This could do it?

Round 1: 2 picks (Own, via ATL)
Round 2: 1 pick
Round 3: 1 pick
Round 5: 2 picks (Own, via TEN)
Nacua
Ferguson
All 2027 1st and 2nd round picks
Click to expand...
In no world am I ever giving up all that for Mendoza. Yes, he's a fine young player but that's nuts. You would make the team worse, not better. I don't even think you'd have to give up that much to get Joe Burrow
 
Maybe "all-in" means a trade of some kind for Max Crosby. We could offer pick#29, Byron Young and some change. Young tailed off dramtically the 2nd half of the season, was he playing injured, I dont know. A new Young contract may not be a great idea, and Verse may never turn into anything more than Jadeveon Clowney clone. Crosby would immediately give this defense an identity that it should be feared. The topic was "ALL-IN" so maybe this is just a wild and ridiculous thought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dieterbrock
bwdenverram said:
In no world am I ever giving up all that for Mendoza. Yes, he's a fine young player but that's nuts. You would make the team worse, not better. I don't even think you'd have to give up that much to get Joe Burrow
Click to expand...

You're banking on Burrow having two more miserable seasons making him easier for the Bengals to trade..... If he has a come back year next season he will be untouchable until 2030.... What will the Rams be like with Stetson for 2 years?????
 
Memento said:
Please, guys. Enough with the political bullshit on both sides, for serious. It hasn’t been allowed here for more than a decade and a half. It will never, ever be allowed here. If you must talk politics, there are plenty of other sites that allow it, but not this site and especially not on this football sub-server.
Click to expand...
I think people are getting overly triggered for some reason. Talking about the Super Bowl halftime show is still about football. When the NFL injects politics into the sport (kneeling being widely accepted" then one should expect to be able to talk about it. Its not like discussing political candidates or whether you're conservative or liberal, we're just talking about what's happening in the game. Maybe some sensitive people should just turn away completely if it hurts their feelings so bad.
 
muggmeister said:
Maybe "all-in" means a trade of some kind for Max Crosby. We could offer pick#29, Byron Young and some change. Young tailed off dramtically the 2nd half of the season, was he playing injured, I dont know. A new Young contract may not be a great idea, and Verse may never turn into anything more than Jadeveon Clowney clone. Crosby would immediately give this defense an identity that it should be feared. The topic was "ALL-IN" so maybe this is just a wild and ridiculous thought.
Click to expand...
I dont think its wild at all. I'd love to have Crosby and while reports are that the Raiders previously turned down a trade offer (from team unknown) of 2 1st rounders, I think their leverage is down now that he's all but said he refuses to play for them. Would I do #29 and Young? Heck yeah. Would the Raiders? Dont think so.... Maybe throw in next year's 2nd round pick?
 
  • Like
Reactions: muggmeister
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back