- Joined
- May 8, 2014
- Messages
- 39,680
He had full power. Also he was not on good terms with Les.And we know this how? I've never seen anything that's actually confirmed this. Just rumors.
He had full power. Also he was not on good terms with Les.And we know this how? I've never seen anything that's actually confirmed this. Just rumors.
I think it is appropriate given your tendency to obsess over any whiff of insult to those you consider to be victims.Oh, you can keep that “victimizing” shit to yourself. What’s up, you watching too much cable news?
Source?He had full power. Also he was not on good terms with Les.
He had full power. Also he was not on good terms with Les.
The fact is that Jeff Fisher had to sign off on Les Snead's hiring. I do think Fisher had a thing for athletic freaks and Snead accommodated him with Brian Quick and Gregg Robinson. Another indication that Fisher was held to a higher standard than Snead was how only Fisher was fired and not Snead at the end. I think Snead knew knew Fisher was going to be fired that last year because he was curiously quiet and in the background that whole season, unlike before and after that year. He was keeping low and let Fisher flail out before the cameras....And we know this how? I've never seen anything that's actually confirmed this. Just rumors.
Weirdly enough I don't think much has changed. I've always liked our draft classes outside of a few "wtf" picks. Hitting on draft picks is just really really hard.It keeps looking better. I would love to know what changed in these last two classes with draft philosophy. It cannot just be identifying leadership qualities.
I’ll be very interested to see if it continues. If Snead keeps hitting on the picks this will be really fun.
Source?
He was the most highly sought after coach that hiring cycle. Rams (Stan) threw money at him plus at the time were a fucking shambles. When he was finally axed, the GM was kept around. So to me it's pretty clear he had full power. Was it ever mentioned by the Rams? Not that I can recall but I am certain of this.Did he? I don't remember this.
Fisher had the last word on everything, as I recall. As pointed out.. he was highly sought after when the Rams brought him in.
He was the most highly sought after coach that hiring cycle. Rams (Stan) threw money at him plus at the time were a fucking shambles. When he was finally axed, the GM was kept around. So to me it's pretty clear he had full power. Was it ever mentioned by the Rams? Not that I can recall but I am certain of this.
It's funny... I actually re-read that MMQB article and there was a quote by the source (which I think can be argued but MMQB is legit) alluding to Fisher feeling that need to remind everyone he was in charge, but then mentioned how even though the talent was improved the team was still losing. So I think his addition by Stan really did elevate us in the personnel side, and even though he was a dickhead or whatever I am sure it helped our personnel side raise the bar because they went from being among the worst in the league to among the best.Fisher had the last word on everything, as I recall. As pointed out.. he was highly sought after when the Rams brought him in.
Snead was kept around during the transition.. and it was basically up to McVay whether the team kept him. McVay and Snead clicked right away and the rest is history.
And, yep.. Fisher loved him some athletic freaks and was definitely drawn to those types of players.
They brought in some excellent players during his time.. but they had many major misses.It's funny... I actually re-read that MMQB article and there was a quote by the source (which I think can be argued but MMQB is legit) alluding to Fisher feeling that need to remind everyone he was in charge, but then mentioned how even though the talent was improved the team was still losing. So I think his addition by Stan really did elevate us in the personnel side, and even though he was a dickhead or whatever I am sure it helped our personnel side raise the bar because they went from being among the worst in the league to among the best.
I mean even given the fact that we haven't done too well up high in our drafts, it is clear our personnel side know what they're doing. Which was not the case before. So maybe in some ways that foot up the ass by Fish made a lot of guys better, to include Snead. But that's a different conversation.
He did that for years, ever since he was with the Rams.I’ve only seen him really going after “traits” with Rochelle and Harris…. Unless we’re going all the way back to Greg Robinson..
Name them. During McVay years.He did that for years, ever since he was with the Rams.
I’ve been critical of Snead’s drafting. I hate all of the trading back. Take BPA. Too many times he’s all about looking for a specific type so he passes up good players and trades back for sixth round picks. The Tutu pick is famously bad. Same with Wagner. And yes that was all him trying to play the board. I didn’t like Rapp in round 2. That’s too high for a strong safety. Most of his drafts have been below average imo. He nailed the AD pick of course but had a colossal whiff in that same draft. His last two drafts have been good so far. I think there was a bit of a philosophy change. I hope he keeps it up.Weirdly enough I don't think much has changed. I've always liked our draft classes outside of a few "wtf" picks. Hitting on draft picks is just really really hard.
Those teams could have been better. Fisher thought he knew offense and his ultra conservative approach scared off any good OC’s that he interviewed. I was excited for the hire. In the end I think he’s best as a DC.It's funny... I actually re-read that MMQB article and there was a quote by the source (which I think can be argued but MMQB is legit) alluding to Fisher feeling that need to remind everyone he was in charge, but then mentioned how even though the talent was improved the team was still losing. So I think his addition by Stan really did elevate us in the personnel side, and even though he was a dickhead or whatever I am sure it helped our personnel side raise the bar because they went from being among the worst in the league to among the best.
I mean even given the fact that we haven't done too well up high in our drafts, it is clear our personnel side know what they're doing. Which was not the case before. So maybe in some ways that foot up the ass by Fish made a lot of guys better, to include Snead. But that's a different conversation.
Yeah I read some articles on this and it's definitely more on a rumor mill than actually what was going on behind closed doors. I'll agree that Fisher might have had final say but it's not something thats been absolutely confirmed. Either way going back to the original point that Snead is directly at least 50% responsible for Goff, Donald, and Gurely.
He was the most highly sought after coach that hiring cycle. Rams (Stan) threw money at him plus at the time were a fucking shambles. When he was finally axed, the GM was kept around. So to me it's pretty clear he had full power. Was it ever mentioned by the Rams? Not that I can recall but I am certain of this.
Let's disagree.Yeah I read some articles on this and it's definitely more on a rumor mill than actually what was going on behind closed doors.
Sorry, but this is nonsense. Structurally.. Fisher was in charge.Yeah I read some articles on this and it's definitely more on a rumor mill than actually what was going on behind closed doors. I'll agree that Fisher might have had final say but it's not something thats been absolutely confirmed. Either way going back to the original point that Snead is directly at least 50% responsible for Goff, Donald, and Gurely.