Memphis Ram
Legend
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2010
- Messages
- 8,573
At the same time each player was used differently. Unlike Taylor, Fannin was a primary weapon and used all over the formation. If Taylor were at Bowling Green and featured and Fannin were at LSU and not featured isn't it possible some opinions could change?Guys... I have to wonder what we're talking about here if people think Mason Taylor has more upside than Harold Fannin?? All Fannin did last year was make big play after big play after big play. One game of his had more highlights than Taylor's entire season.
Last season Fannin broke 34 tackles which led all TEs. By a lot. 1555 yards which led all of college football. Against real opponents too. 137 yards against Texas A&M. 145 yards against Penn State. Explosive after the catch, down the field, intermediate routes, you name it. Underrated as a blocker too if he gets his technique down. Strong as an ox. Hands like glue.
Want to know how many tackles Mason Taylor broke? 5. 14 missed tackles his entire career. 9.9 yards per reception last season. Game high of 77 yards against UCLA.
Sure Mason Taylor is a solid in-line tight end but even if he reaches his full potential we're looking at maybe being as good as Higbee. And that's good but not worth a first round pick. Maybe worth a late second round pick.
Fannin could be a game changer in the right offense. Taylor could be a decent role player.
I'd love to see the counter-argument. A .06 40 time difference at the underwear olympics and a 9 pound weight difference is not a good argument to me. Teams used that same backwards logic to pass up on Kupp in 2017.
And despite what they did in college, the key is their projection into the NFL.
I'd guess there a quite of few examples of kids with far better college stats being outplayed by kids with lesser college stat lines after entering the league. In fact, I'm sure a bunch of players beat Nacua's college stats.
Last edited: