LACHAMP46
A snazzy title
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2013
- Messages
- 11,735
I EVEN have thoughts the coaches are only starting Hill to let him absorb the hits because he's not part of next years plans .
Ouch!!!!! LOL
I EVEN have thoughts the coaches are only starting Hill to let him absorb the hits because he's not part of next years plans .
Please good people. Can we leave the Hill / Davis debate until after we watch Hill this week? There will be plenty to compare on Monday.
I really would like to see what people think of Hill's only playing time based on what he did and not assumptions.
Thank you.
Why do I have to suffer accusations every time I want to discuss Hill? Can't you just go debate Hill / Davis on one of the many Hill / Davis threads?
I can see as a Davis fan you are not happy with the decision and don't think Hill will be an improvement. You've said as much over and over on other threads. I'm abandoning those threads because it's all been said.
I want to discuss Hill and the only real game time information we have on him with the Rams. It's not like I'm saying this quarter or that or this game or that, it's all we have. If you insist on littering this thread, so be it, I have no power to stop you. I asked.
"are you going to come on the board and proclaim error if we get crushed Sunday."
Yes, yes I will. If Hill sucks, I will personally start a Hill sucks thread for every Davis fan to beat me up. Happy?
I actually heard a coach intimate that Steve Pisarcek was playing for the Giants back in the day and that Jerry Goldstein was the QB of the future but they weren't risking his health behind the crappy o-line they hadOuch!!!!! LOL
I EVEN have thoughts the coaches are only starting Hill to let him absorb the hits because he's not part of next years plans.
I do not think much can be read into the 1/2 Hill played (good or bad):
1. was the first game of the season, schotty who seems to make good game plans (but fails to adjust for some reason) had plenty of time to makea game plan.
2. The team was the healthiest it has been all year - especially the Oline (I still think GRob should have started/played more)
3. it was not against an elite team or defense
4. If our new players were going to surprise anyone it was that game
5. the net result was 3 points while Hill was in.....3
One half of football does not a QB make, especially a 34 year old guy with 1 full start in the last 3 years.
Not sure how you can credit drops to say he looked better than he did. Davis had to deal with the same thing (cough, infamous Cookie drop for an easy TD that completely changed the complexion of the DAL game for the worse.)
I think it's silly to get excited by one half. Hill could have gotten worse as the game progressed, like Davis has in many of his. Still unconvinced he survives many hits. Like I said, Hill is entirely an unknown. I have no idea what we'll get Sunday, but I just won't be surprised if he's not much better than Davis.
Because you say things like this:
"People who say he isn't mobile need to go watch him"
If you JUST WANT to express opinion do it, bring the other people on the board up as a subject ,they are going to make you the subject as well.
Yes ,I'm happy ,but you need to realize the elevation of Hill you attempt won't happen in a vacuum. The two are part of the same team ,if you don't think Hill is going to be better , say so ,if you do then it's not an accusation it's an accurate observation, es verdad?
Wow, just wow. Have you even gone back to look at Hill's play or is this just going to be an attack Hill rant?
Because you say things like this:
"People who say he isn't mobile need to go watch him"
If you JUST WANT to express opinion do it, bring the other people on the board up as a subject ,they are going to make you the subject as well.
Yes ,I'm happy ,but you need to realize the elevation of Hill you attempt won't happen in a vacuum. The two are part of the same team ,if you don't think Hill is going to be better , say so ,if you do then it's not an accusation it's an accurate observation, es verdad?
"are you going to come on the board and proclaim error if we get crushed Sunday."
Yes, yes I will. If Hill is worse than Davis, I will personally start a RamzFanz is an idiot thread for every Davis fan to beat me up. Will you do the same if he's better than Davis? [CHALLENGE ISSUED]
Hill? never heard of the guy.
Let's be clear you asked people for thoughts you said ( what say you) ,you have an impression , so do others , if they don't match then they don't but don't intimate that they haven't seen things or failed to watch or aren't paying attention JUST because their impressions don't fit with yours .
Am I to believe that I must affirm your opinion to be legitimate in this thread ,because you are certainly implying it when you ask if I have watched .
Evaluating on the basis of one half of football is a like grabbing the elephant by the tail and proclaiming it to be like a rope ,by that standard Washington would be headed for the Super Bowl behind Kirk Cousins
No I won't he's going to have to win three games before I proclaim him as good,and further I have already said I don't think the QB position is why we've lost half the games or even ALL we have ,so why would I attribute a win to Hill alone?
I will say this we won't win a shoot out ,our defense is going to have to shut Manning down for us to win and if they do and we do, either of our Qb's are capable of winning a 13-10 game
Have you watched the play time we have and what did you think?