Rams looking to trade Van Jefferson (Traded to Atl)

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

TheTackle

Pro Bowler
Joined
Apr 3, 2015
Messages
1,268
Just putting it out there. If we sign big money FAs over the next two years we will not receive any comp picks. Is Snead planning for more draft capital so they continue the trend of betting on numbers to gain hits?
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,039
Thought on Overthecap.com it said we'd only save a few hundred thousand.
It really depends on whether they had accounted for the $410k of signing bonus. I figure that was already in the cap number and the near 1 mill is cap "savings"
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
22,775
Sorry if it’s already been posted.

The Rams save nearly 1 million in cap space with the trade Van Jefferson. Add the savings with Akers and extending/restructure? Of Higbee. The Rams now have 6.1 million in cap space.

So they have some room to trade for a vet if they wanted to or a good one becomes available.
 

So Ram

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
15,153
Sorry if it’s already been posted.

The Rams save nearly 1 million in cap space with the trade Van Jefferson. Add the savings with Akers and extending/restructure? Of Higbee. The Rams now have 6.1 million in cap space.

So they have some room to trade for a vet if they wanted to or a good one becomes available.
YEP !! Makes sense & they know they have issues with a pass rush.
 

RamWoodie

Legend
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
5,257
I hope the main reason Is to get some pass rush help. I don't like the trade if this is all to it. Jefferson frees up about 1 mil.

I'm thinking it may go with a move to get AD some help by freeing up money to make a move to help the DLine.
 

snackdaddy

Who's your snackdaddy?
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
12,091
Name
Charlie
I never expected much for Van. Pretty sure it wasn't so much about getting something in return as it was about saving a little cap money and moving on from a guy they didn't need.

I also think they also wanted to do him right. With Kupp, Puka and Tutu he wasn't going to get many opportunities. He wasn't going to have much value in free agency. Now he's got a chance at improving that this season.
 

fanotodd

Diehard
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 2, 2013
Messages
2,195
Name
Fanotodd
Wouldn’t we get a comp pick if we hold on to him and he then signs elsewhere when his contract expires at the end of the season?

This is the position I have always taken; plus, it’s a long season and injuries happen.
But two things come to mind:

1) every game he sits on the bench, his value decreases.
2) if he walks into McVay’s office and asks to be dealt, the Rams, being the class act they’ve become, would more than likely accommodate.
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
23,280
Name
mojo
I don’t beat up on too many Rams players. But…

Van is soft. He needs a perfect ball and space to get the ball, he disappears when the team needs “others” to step up, he’s useless in off schedule drills, I don’t sense he’s much of a competitor.

Good luck and goodbye.
 

OregonRamsFan

All Horned Up
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
2,005
In Van’s defense he probably hasn’t slept since his baby was born last SB. A man needs his sleep. Lol.
 

Allen2McVay

Legend
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
8,803
Name
Jim
Wouldn’t we get a comp pick if we hold on to him and he then signs elsewhere when his contract expires at the end of the season?

Not necessarily. And, probably not in this case.

The comp picks are based on a formula that considers the net additions (players added) and subtractions (players lost). It considers the number of free agents added and lost; and the contracts they receive.

In recent years, the Rams have lost players in free agency but signed very few. As a result, they have been awarded comp picks because their losses far exceeded their additions.

Consider last off-season when the Rams lost Gaines, Gay, Rapp, Long, Hill, Edwards, Mayfield, Robinson and others. Who did they sign in free agency? No one! All their additions (Witherspoon, Rypien, Michel, Robinson and the two Johnsons) were signed after the Draft; and, therefore do not apply to the comp pick formula.

So the Rams will get comp picks for the 2024 Draft ... three or four but they will be late round picks because none of the ex-Rams received big-$ contracts.

Now consider the up-coming 2024 free agency. The Rams will have cap space and figure to be active. Meanwhile, they do not have big-ticket players set to leave via free agency. Their additions should easily exceed their losses. That means no comp picks in 2025. Jefferson was not going to change that.
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
23,280
Name
mojo
I’d rather have the less talented Sko in there battling defenders for the ball and pushing guys around in the run gm
 

Allen2McVay

Legend
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
8,803
Name
Jim
Soonest would be 2025 draft, however, right?

With cap space, the Rams figure to be active in Free Agency in 2024 but they don't have many significant players scheduled to be free agents (Fuller, Dotson and maybe Shelton).

As a result, their net additions (free agents signed) should easily exceed players lost (Rams free agents signing elsewhere). The comp pick formula considers both number of players lost and especially the size of contracts. Accordingly, the Rams don't figure to get comp picks for the 2025 Draft based on 2024 free agency.

Now, they should get 3 or 4 comp picks for the 2024 Draft based on the 2023 Free Agency Period when the Rams lost a ton of players but were the only team in the NFL not to sign a single free agent.