Players can be fined and or suspended for publicly criticizing referees. I’m not saying he should be, I’m just saying that’s the rules.Suspended for what exactly?
It falls under “Conduct Detrimental to the League”.
Last edited:
Players can be fined and or suspended for publicly criticizing referees. I’m not saying he should be, I’m just saying that’s the rules.Suspended for what exactly?
Couldn’t even watch it,but I’m sure Mcvay thought PUKA would be SMARTER & more mature than that.I agree much ado about nothing. McVay had cleared it so it seems just not on the short week. They'll be there in the long off week on a day not much is going on.
Ummm....work?? I'm retired......Oh gawd. You guys need to get back to work and off the forums
Not sure why Puka would be involved this someone like this.
Welp.... this is a helluva lot bigger than 800 followers. Front page story on ESPN now..This amounts to nothing. I'm sure their 800 followers will be thrilled. Nacua is a fine young man and a savage on the field. Love the way he just throws defenders off him as they desperately try to hold him. One defender ended up flat on his face in the last game.
If the Refs use that as spite they got bigger issues and should not be an NFL ref......
Yep - here it is - thanks RichWelp.... this is a helluva lot bigger than 800 followers. Front page story on ESPN now..
It would be interesting to see how that would be interpreted. My understanding is that conduct detrimental to the league is more aimed at illegal activity, not speaking your mind on your personal time. The only time I've seen the league fine coaches or players is when they said something in the post game pressers when they are still on mandatory NFL time.It falls under “Conduct Detrimental to the League”.
Great point. For the least penalized team this year, why kick the frikken zebra/hornets nest?The ironic thing is the Rams have the least penalties in the league this season. They are usually near the bottom under McVay. Why even talk like that while being filmed?
The only thing I see in that policy that could possibly result in a fine that wouldn't be appealed if they tried is the last part of "prohibited conduct":If the Rams and NFL are doing this by the book, this is a potential violation that hurts the reputation of the NFL:
1. Team needs to report it
2. Puka will be investigated
3. Expect a fine
This thing ain’t good… and before anyone suggests different.. no, I don’t think Puka was thinking in these terms at all… but.. damn.
View: https://x.com/avivaklompas/status/2001463486422093968?s=46
Thank god.This person is extremely political. We don't need to post every social media response to what Puka did (said). I am deleting it to discourage this direction.
You read the same thing I did. NFL already fined Reid and Mahomes for similar misconduct. Throw on top of that, actions that some Jews may find offensive.The only thing I see in that policy that could possibly result in a fine that wouldn't be appealed if they tried is the last part of "prohibited conduct":
▪ Conduct that undermines or puts at risk the integrity of the NFL, NFL clubs, or NFL personnel.
And at best, it is ambiguous if you are trying to apply it to what Puka did (said).
And this is also ambiguous and wouldn't seem to apply as it is clearly more geared at harmful behavior/activity. But the bolded part is a possible leg they could stand on but it still seems pretty shaky:
Conduct by anyone in the league that is illegal, violent, dangerous, or irresponsible puts innocent victims at risk, damages the reputation of others in the game, and undercuts public respect and support for the NFL.
They may very well try to fine him but I would guess if the fine is substantial, it will be appealed and probably dismissed. I'd be shocked if they try to suspend him for any time period. The team itself might - but I doubt that as well.
I believe that was during post game pressers which are mandatory - thus on company time.NFL already fined Reid and Mahomes for similar misconduct,
I wasn't saying YOU were being political with your post. The tweet itself was from someone very political and if you read further, she had one small tweet about Puka among a long list of political posts. Whether anyone here agrees or not with her posts, they are political. We're not going down that road.The suggestion that I’m making ANY kind of political statement with this is utter, complete nonsense.
And I would not have posted something that one person took exception to.I wasn't saying YOU were being political with your post. The tweet itself was from someone very political and if you read further, she had one small tweet about Puka among a long list of political posts. Whether anyone here agrees or not with her posts, they are political. We're not going down that road.
But that is beside the point. With millions and millions of people on social media, are we to just have them all show up here? It's ridiculous.