GAME DAY Packers at Bears - Wild Card Playoff
- Thread starter CGI_Ram
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
El Chapo Jr
Legend
SteezyEndo
The Immaculate Exception
There Defense just closed out GB to nothing. The D allowed Caleb to cook in the 2nd half. A fired up Chicago team is bad news.
I'd prefer this scenario. I like the Rams chances better at Chicago vs. at Philly. Then if the 9ers can beat the Hags, the NFC championship would be at Sofi. Or, at Seattle if the Hags beat the 9ers. I know Philly has been somewhat shitty the last 5-6 games, but would rather play at Sofi vs. back to Philly.
El Chapo Jr
Legend
I also watched the Whiners shit on that defense too. They aren't great at all. We can handle them.
SteezyEndo
The Immaculate Exception
Playoffs is a different beast though what you saw then isn’t what you’ll see now. But yeah I rather play a team we are familiar with.
What scares me about Chicago is Caleb making plays out of structure. He’s really dangerous when he breaks contain.
SteezyEndo
The Immaculate Exception
He is the type of QB I would like the Rams to get once Stafford retires. Minus the tantrums.
El Chapo Jr
Legend
Sure, they create turnovers but they were ranked 24th in scoring defense at 23.8 per game. Carolina was 18th at 22.3. We should score 30 against both teams.
Well, if it's 20 degrees that could be an issue. And that is where s mobile QB has an advantage with broken plays on an icy field. That would be my concern.
Regardless, I don't see SF winning tomorrow. I want them to because I hate the Eagles, but I think the Niners are too beat up.... which probably means the Niners win easy.
El Chapo Jr
Legend
I also think the Whiners are done. Their defense is straight doo doo. Even though Philly starts slow, they'll probably pull away. If SF somehow wins, I highly doubt they'd get past Seattle.
He's a stud of a coach. Bears have a very bright future with that dude in charge.
.
I'd be so pissed of i was a packers fan. I fell asleep when it was 21-3 and didn't wake up until it was 21-9 and saw a long completion to Loveland before the score became 21-16.
Apparently LaFleur sat on the lead the whole time i was asleep. At least that's what everyone in the room told me. And didn't start trying to score again until that td by the bears.
We, as Rams fans, know their pain. I was ropeable when Mcvay did it with 8 mins left in the game against the seagulls, for one drive. The packers did it the whole 3rd qtr and half the 4th qtr.
Quote frankly, a sackable offence.
.
I'd be so pissed of i was a packers fan. I fell asleep when it was 21-3 and didn't wake up until it was 21-9 and saw a long completion to Loveland before the score became 21-16.
Apparently LaFleur sat on the lead the whole time i was asleep. At least that's what everyone in the room told me. And didn't start trying to score again until that td by the bears.
We, as Rams fans, know their pain. I was ropeable when Mcvay did it with 8 mins left in the game against the seagulls, for one drive. The packers did it the whole 3rd qtr and half the 4th qtr.
Quote frankly, a sackable offence.
.
I haven't read this entire thread, so I apologize if this has been covered, but could somebody enlighten me. Concerning those two "fumbles/incompletions" by Bears tight ends last night, what are the actual requirements for a completion. Is it two feet down and then another step or two feet down and a football move? Those two didn't take a complete step after getting two feet down but they sure looked like they made a football move!!!!
That game could cost Matt LaFleur his job, now if that is the case, he will get hired in a nanosecond. But I would not be shocked if Green Bay made a change.