WestCoastRam
Legend
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
- Messages
- 6,241
I mean, I'm a bit agnostic here. Murphy might be the superior prospect. Verse will probably be a high secondary rusher. (Which I'd prob still take at 19 depending on who's avail).I like Murphy, but there’s no way I take him if Verse is still on the board.
From what I'm gathering, it seems the consensus is concluding that Murphy is the overall better talent. I'm seeing most now saying that he's a top 15 talent.I like Murphy, but there’s no way I take him if Verse is still on the board.
From what I'm gathering, it seems the consensus is concluding that Murphy is the overall better talent.
No I mean the consensus amongst the NFL expert community...or maybe just the ones I'm hearing.Do you mean the 'consensus' of us? A bunch of fans that don't know what the Hell we are talking about?
OK ... That's Fine ... Those guys are much smarter than us.No I mean the consensus amongst the NFL expert community...or maybe just the ones I'm hearing.
He can stand up and did it in games, but don't know if he can drop well. I think he could end up being a Leonard Floyd + type of player.From what I'm gathering, it seems the consensus is concluding that Murphy is the overall better talent. I'm seeing most now saying that he's a top 15 talent.
On Verse, do you see him as a stand up 3/4 edge or will he put his hand in the dirt?
He can play both. Many people are too quick to pigeonhole players based on their college careers; the pro game is an entirely different kettle of fish.On Verse, do you see him as a stand up 3/4 edge or will he put his hand in the dirt?
I mean, he did both in college.He can play both. Many people are too quick to pigeonhole players based on their college careers; the pro game is an entirely different kettle of fish.
Yeah; I was making a more general point.I mean, he did both in college.
Here's the thing about Newton: Can he take on double teams? I don't think there's much tape of him doing it and when he does he gets stymied.I'd trade down to the Bills in that scenario and take Jer'Zahn Newton. But I think you'd absolutely have to take him at #19.
Here's the thing about Newton: Can he take on double teams? I don't think there's much tape of him doing it and when he does he gets stymied.
Seems rich to take a guy like that at 19.
Totally. And then, another good question/point is what are projectable traits? For instance, we can look at a guys frame and make a projection of how much more weight/strength he might be able to put on. Or we can look at a guys technique and project what he might be able to improve on.Yeah; I was making a more general point.
“So-and-so only did this in college, so that’s all that he’ll ever do.”
Kobie's not good enough to eat doubles all the time.You have Kobie Turner taking most of those double teams. But look at Newton's sophomore year when he wasn't dealing with a foot injury. You saw some of the same shit AD did.
Is he going to be AD? Absolutely not, but I could see a few All-Pros in Newton's future.
Kobie's not good enough to eat doubles all the time.
I think there's definitely stuff to like about Newton, just think people are way overvaluing him and what he can do. All-pro seems a bit rich and wish-fullfilly.
I haven't seen the tape of him splitting doubles much... you got... *scratches neck* any of that tapeI'm telling you, I wanted Newton before AD retired. Look at his sophomore year when he was healthy. Newton played through a bad foot injury. He did a lot of the exact things AD did, splitting doubles (his fellow DT, Keith Randolph, benefitted tons from what Newton took), constantly fighting with his hands, his motor, his first-step.
I've watched Ed Oliver, Quinnen Williams, and many other undersized DTs. Newton is the first one that reminds me of AD, and I wanted him before AD retired, to learn from him.
Jer'Zhan Newton is absolutely the real deal.