I'm pretty obviously not in favor of this move. Davis did SO WELL earlier this year. Even though he has not been doing well lately, I don't believe you do that well as a fluke. There were obviously problems, but I thought at least some of them could be fixed. Injuries at other positions didn't help though.
Hill doesn't have that type of ceiling. He's the very definition of a journeyman. And the problems outside of the QB position are still going to be there. Those pounding the table for him might find out that Mr. Spock was speaking the truth when he said "After a time, you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing, after all, as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true." (TOS Episode #30: "Amok Time") I think there is a higher possibility of Hill being worse than Davis than there is of him being better. When he was on the bench, statements that Hill would be better could not be proven wrong.
I'm DEFINITELY not a fan of how Fisher made this move. I don't see it as "admitting a mistake" at all. I see it as wishy washy and hurtful to his leadership in the long run since he just showed that a vote of confidence from him is meaningless. And if Hill goes out there and fails or is injured, how can Davis believe in his coach now?
BUT, as was said elsewhere by others (I know Prime Time said it at one point), if the Rams play Davis, I'm going to cheer for Davis to do well. If the Rams play Hill, I'm going to cheer for Hill to do well. I'm not going to hope the Rams tank so I can rub it in everyone's faces that "I told you so". I'm definitely not going to be the guy to insist that unless you agree with me, you either like losing or don't like winning. I'm hoping I can be the guy to say "You know what? I was wrong. We should have stayed with Hill."
Go Rams. And assuming Fisher doesn't change his mind again, go Hill.
Hey... who put this box of Ivory Soap underneath me?