Goffing, depicted in one image.

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
23,623
Name
mojo
“Goff kinda sucks”
iu
 

El Chapo Jr

Legend
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
5,515
They couldnt have that team around him if they kept Stafford, the majority of that team is what they got for him
No one is saying that. The comparison to how Stafford is better than Goff is just being discussed based on if they both had all the current Lions weapons who would do better. Hypotheticals basically lol
 

Steve808

Pro Bowler
Joined
Nov 27, 2017
Messages
1,968
Name
Steve
I understand disappointment in Goff. If I were a Lions fan I’d throw a lot of disappointment his way. But I don’t understand any hatred towards Goff. And I’ll use Marc Bulger as a comparable example. Rams under him were disappointing but was there hatred towards him?
I’m honestly asking - as Rams fans what’s the reason for hatred towards Goff?
I

Goff was an assassin against the whiners but key dropped balls killed their chances. Against the commodes, he had a sub par game, but then again, their defense gave up a lot of points so it's not all on Goff.

I think the trade for Stafford was win-win, but the Rams have a title so right now we have a one up but Goff is young and the Lions will be good next season, as will the Rams.
 

Ram_Rally

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
6,201
What everybody has forgotten

Without Goff, we don't get Stafford.

>>>drops Mic
That's Not technically accurate. We had to trade Goff to make the cap work. If we didn't have Goff then we could've just traded the picks. In fact, one of the first round picks was because the lions had to take Goff off our hands. It's becoming revisionist history especially with lions fans because Goff ended up playing well enough to stay there. He was a cut candidate for them in 2021.
 
Last edited:

snackdaddy

Who's your snackdaddy?
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
12,976
Name
Charlie
Goff is a fine quarterback. You could do worse than him for sure. But I don't see him winning 3 or 4 playoff games in a row. He can decimate lesser teams. But when you get to the playoffs you have to win several against the best to be a champion. Kinda like Stafford.
 

Tano

Legend
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
10,332
That's Not technically accurate. We had to trade Goff to make the cap work. If we didn't have Goff then we could've just traded the picks. In fact, one of the first round picks was because the lions had to take Goff off our hands. It's becoming revisionist history especially with lions fans because Goff ended up playing well enough to stay there. He was a cut candidate for them in 2021.
I completely disagree. Holmes was already pretty much going to send Stafford to SF when the Rams said we will give you Goff 2 first picks and a third. Holmes knew Goff and knew he was a capable QB to carry them thru until they could get a better QB. Fortunately, Goff was their better QB.
 

Tano

Legend
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
10,332
Goff is a fine quarterback. You could do worse than him for sure. But I don't see him winning 3 or 4 playoff games in a row. He can decimate lesser teams. But when you get to the playoffs you have to win several against the best to be a champion. Kinda like Stafford.
He had SF beaten last year. Campbell lost that game. Plus two critical drops by Reynolds. Reynolds catches either one and Lions go to the superbowl.

This year - Goff had one of his horrible games that he has from time to time. Unfortunately, it came in the playoff game.
 

Ram_Rally

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
6,201
I completely disagree. Holmes was already pretty much going to send Stafford to SF when the Rams said we will give you Goff 2 first picks and a third. Holmes knew Goff and knew he was a capable QB to carry them thru until they could get a better QB. Fortunately, Goff was their better QB.
That's not at all how I remember it. I specifically remember reading that the Rams had to sweeten the pot. In fact, if you really think that Holmes covered goff, then we got fleeced if we had to give up two first in addition to him. I'm not above being wrong though. But I recall the lions having to take Goff's contract which no one wanted as part of the reason.
 
Last edited: