Current FA options at Edge & CB

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Allen2McVay

Legend
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
8,813
Name
Jim
Why will he be cut? I don’t follow the Giants, so I’m just curious.
Cap space. Giants have about $7M of cap space right now ... similar to the Rams.

Unlike the Rams, the Giants have a number of high draft choices. Two in the top ten; and five in the top-81.

New York needs more than $16M to sign its draft class. Can save some $ if they release Bradberry but can save more if they can find a trade-partner that can take-on his salary, even if it does not garner a high pick.
 

El Chapo Jr

Legend
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
5,091
Don’t teams have to follow waiver claims at some point soon? The Rams will be on the bottom of the pile. Or is that only for players released that were under contract?
If he's cut, he's free to sign with anyone because he's accrued more than 4 years. If less, then he's subject to waiver wire.

Screenshot_20220417-143730.png
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,232
Name
Burger man
James Bradberry going to be a Ram......my best educated guess as he will be cut soon.

James Bradberry not at Giants’ voluntary work as they continue to work on trade​

Giants cornerback James Bradberry remains on the roster, but it might not be for much longer.

For now, Bradberry is out of sight but not out of mind.

He did not report for the start of voluntary offseason workouts with the team and is not expected to report, Zack Rosenblatt of NJ.com reports. The Giants hope to trade Bradberry to create much needed salary cap space.

But — surprise! — no team appears eager to take on his $21.8 million cap hit in the final year of his contract, especially when the Giants might cut Bradberry in the absence of suitor. Bradberry likely would already have hit free agency if not for the fact that a trade would save the Giants $12.1 million, while cutting him would save $10.1 million.

The Giants will have to move sooner than later as they still need to clear more cap space to sign all of their draft choices.

Bradberry, 28, made the Pro Bowl in 2020. He has 380 tackles, 15 interceptions and 82 pass breakups in 92 career games.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,708
Here's an article on Bradberry that is quite flattering from last year. Can't really put it here without losing the gifs that are embedded.

This seems like a case of a guy putting his feet up after being paid. So idk. I do think it's interesting that Patrick Graham (who went to Vegas with McDaniels) featured prominently in his play. So maybe Vegas has their eye on him, or at least they should have their eye on him and if they don't, well, maybe there's a good reason for that.

But yes I am of course intrigued. Long corners are hard to find.
 

Flatlyner

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Survivor Champion
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
4,700
Oh yeah, Bradberry is untouchable with that contract due. 21.8 mil?!?! Damn thats steep for any CB, let alone one not named Ramsey. He will be cut I'm sure.
 

PARAM

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
4,375
Oh yeah, Bradberry is untouchable with that contract due. 21.8 mil?!?! Damn thats steep for any CB, let alone one not named Ramsey. He will be cut I'm sure.
He would "only" cost a new team 13.4 mil in a trade. 8.3 of that 21 mil is the prorated bonus on the Giants tab. Still 13.4 is a lot of scratch. Having said that, if he's cut it'll cost the Giants 11.7 mil in dead money with a cap savings of 10.1. They need to find a trade partner.
 

BonifayRam

Legend
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
13,435
Name
Vernon
John Johnson was starting after 4 games and he was a third round pick. This draft is supposedly deep in the middle rounds.
Snead had one of his 7th rd 2019 drafted safeties starting for the 2021 WC/Division/NFC Championship & the SB winning all four:trophy:. Snead used a 2020 6th rd drafted safety as his starter for the last two winning seasons.

So there is enough evidence Snead is STILL fully capable of finding good useful roster-filling safeties on the third day of NFL drafts.

Why would we have lost faith here in Snead's ability that he can not do it again?
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
22,780
Snead had one of his 7th rd 2019 drafted safeties starting for the 2021 WC/Division/NFC Championship & the SB winning all four:trophy:. Snead used a 2020 6th rd drafted safety as his starter for the last two winning seasons.

So there is enough evidence Snead is STILL fully capable of finding good useful roster-filling safeties on the third day of NFL drafts.

Why would we have lost faith here in Snead's ability that he can not do it again?
Tutu Atwell? Lewis? Burgess? Snead has demonstrated that he can mess up some picks.

I’d say Tutu is the big one that could raise doubts.

Plus every draft is different. Will there be another John Johnson available at the end of round three?
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,708
One of the safeties on the board played at Kentucky (Corker) and is another box/teams/development type the Rams seem to love. He looks like a late round dude especially in this draft. Coen will have the inside scoop on him for sure.
 

PARAM

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
4,375
Tutu Atwell? Lewis? Burgess? Snead has demonstrated that he can mess up some picks.

I’d say Tutu is the big one that could raise doubts.

Plus every draft is different. Will there be another John Johnson available at the end of round three?
What makes me shake my head is some fans expect P-E-R-F-E-C-T. Every GM has demonstrated that he can mess up some picks!! Why? Because the NFL draft is a lottery. Sometimes you hit, sometimes you don't. To expect every draft choice to be one that works out right away or ever....is ridiculous. The Patriots drafted 2 tight ends in 2020, both in the 3rd round. #91 and #101. That worked out so good they spent $87 million on 2 tight ends in free agency prior to the 2021 season.

"Les Snead needs to get this draft right!!!" Yeah, okay.
 
Last edited:

fanotodd

Diehard
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 2, 2013
Messages
2,203
Name
Fanotodd
John Johnson was starting after 4 games and he was a third round pick. This draft is supposedly deep in the middle rounds.
I don’t doubt that the Rams FO can find talent in the later rounds, including EVENTUAL starters; but DAY ONE starters? Kupp is the only one that comes to mind in the McVay era. It would seem that there is something other than athletic ability a person has to show and develop before McVay will let him start. We know EJones was destined to be a starter, but he wasn’t thrown out there to learn on the fly.
Scott, Holland, Edwards, and Gaines are some more good examples of this process—developing into starters.

But hey, isn’t that what those later rounds can do for a good FO?
 

PARAM

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
4,375
Just curious how everybody views the roster.......How many "day one" starters do the Rams need?
 

Allen2McVay

Legend
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
8,813
Name
Jim
Just curious how everybody views the roster.......How many "day one" starters do the Rams need?
Maybe None but RG, CB opposite Ramsey and Edge opposite Floyd would seem to be the List.

Not sure the up-coming Draft (#104 overall) will fill any of those spots ... especially for Week One.

Current Projected Starters (best-guess)
Hollins, backed-up by Lewis and Garrett at Edge/OLB.

Long and Rochell in competition at CB. Personally, hoping for James Bradberry via trade.

RG is the most interesting to me ... Evans, Shelton, Anchrum.

Should the Rams sign Tyrann Mathieu, then guessing he starts with Fuller at the Safety spots.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
22,780
I don’t doubt that the Rams FO can find talent in the later rounds, including EVENTUAL starters; but DAY ONE starters? Kupp is the only one that comes to mind in the McVay era. It would seem that there is something other than athletic ability a person has to show and develop before McVay will let him start. We know EJones was destined to be a starter, but he wasn’t thrown out there to learn on the fly.
Scott, Holland, Edwards, and Gaines are some more good examples of this process—developing into starters.

But hey, isn’t that what those later rounds can do for a good FO?
That’s the way it goes when Snead is constantly focusing on measurables in an attempt to find first round ability in rounds three and up. It works some of the time. But when he found his gems they were football players first. I think he did it with JJ, Kupp, Fuller, Gaines. It’s one hang up I will always have with Snead. Sometimes he gets too far taken by the measurables and forgets his best finds were great football players more than they were great athletes. I’d prefer a mix of talent to athleticism.
 

PARAM

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
4,375
That’s the way it goes when Snead is constantly focusing on measurables in an attempt to find first round ability in rounds three and up. It works some of the time. But when he found his gems they were football players first. I think he did it with JJ, Kupp, Fuller, Gaines. It’s one hang up I will always have with Snead. Sometimes he gets too far taken by the measurables and forgets his best finds were great football players more than they were great athletes. I’d prefer a mix of talent to athleticism.
Just a couple of questions.......What players are you talking about? When I read draft profiles on Rams draft picks, I often see "good football IQ", "team leader", "team captain", "hard worker", "great preparation" as well as measurables and talent. Is this a Tutu thing?
 

fanotodd

Diehard
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 2, 2013
Messages
2,203
Name
Fanotodd
Just curious how everybody views the roster.......How many "day one" starters do the Rams need?

Unless they are comfortable starting either Long or Rochelle, I’d say they could use one at CB. But like I said earlier, I wouldn’t count on it via the draft. This is why I predict a trade.
The question is whether or not it happens before opening day.
Both Ramsey and Peters were acquired that way.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,232
Name
Burger man
Unless they are comfortable starting either Long or Rochelle, I’d say they could use one at CB. But like I said earlier, I wouldn’t count on it via the draft. This is why I predict a trade.
The question is whether or not it happens before opening day.
Both Ramsey and Peters were acquired that way.

Mathieu feels like a good fit, if not him someone with some starting experience.

But a trade somewhere feels likely.
 

PARAM

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
4,375
Unless they are comfortable starting either Long or Rochelle, I’d say they could use one at CB. But like I said earlier, I wouldn’t count on it via the draft. This is why I predict a trade.
The question is whether or not it happens before opening day.
Both Ramsey and Peters were acquired that way.
So 1 ? One? Maybe ? But not in the draft?

McVay and Snead prioritize CB and Edge in free agency/trade rather than the draft. 2 CBs in the draft, 3 in free agency/trade. 2 edge in the draft (top 4 rounds), 3 in free agency/trade.

Funny how Snead's drafting style changed when McVay arrived
 

BonifayRam

Legend
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
13,435
Name
Vernon
Snead had one of his 7th rd 2019 drafted safeties starting for the 2021 WC/Division/NFC Championship & the SB winning all four:trophy:. Snead used a 2020 6th rd drafted safety as his starter for the last two winning seasons.

So there is enough evidence Snead is STILL fully capable of finding good useful roster-filling safeties on the third day of NFL drafts.

Why would we have lost faith here in Snead's ability that he can not do it again?

It looks like the LA Rams chose a great NFL Draft for late picks​


The LA Rams select for the first time at the 104th pick in the 2022 NFL Draft. At one point, the Rams were both the last team to pick for the first time, and the least-valued draft picks arsenal for the upcoming draft. But thanks to a rather aggressive off-season, the least value (Per Tankathon.com) now goes to the Miami Dolphins.

The Rams are undoubtedly trendsetters in the NFL right now, as many teams have adopted their more aggressive approach to roster building. But while other teams have a feel of playing some NFL version of Simon Says or Follow the Leader, there are subtle differences in the methods of the LA Rams front office that suggests that they have a master plan for this offseason.

Even as the LA Rams had traded their early-round picks, the team seemed to keep an eye on the number of picks in this upcoming draft. Right now the Rams have eight such picks, and that is a nice volume of newly selected rookies to add to the roster. But as only one of two NFL teams without a single Top-100 pick, how impactful can the Rams draft be this year?

Don’t discount the LA Rams draft so quickly, urges Mike Florio and Chris Simms on one of the latest episodes of Peter King’s Football Morning in America.

In their latest broadcast, the article assembled 12 NFL GMs/coaches/and personnel executives to discuss the qualities and characteristics of the 2022 NFL Draft. The consensus? Yes, this one will be wild and wacky. The impact of COVID-19 compelled many young prospects to return to collegiate football and enter the 2022 NFL Draft. Now, what does this all mean?

The drop-off in talent from the Top-10 to the rest of the draft is steep and material. That’s good news for the Rams in that they are not necessarily missing out on a game-changer rookie by having traded away the 32nd and 64th overall picks in this draft. In fact, they may have been wise to do so, as the pay scale for rookies still pays a premium to early selections out of the draft.

The consensus is that so many good receivers in the draft that many teams will wait to select one. That could be very good news if the LA Rams have their hearts set on drafting a receiver. Who am I kidding? They could draft multiple receivers, again.

The consensus from this group is that cornerbacks are thin. That runs in the exact opposite direction of our early depth analysis of this draft, as cornerbacks were rated as the third deepest position of this draft. How can that be? The Pro Football Talk article is skewed towards teams looking at the early rounds. As is the case with several positions, few prospects in this draft class have the unquestioned profiles of being NFL ready. That actually benefits the Rams somewhat, as the obscurity over who are the standout defensive backs gives the always-prepared Rams draft team an advantage over other teams.

In the end, the consensus of the 2022 NFL Draft is all over the place from early in round one. That lack of agreement creates a greater chance for quality players to slip to the Rams in later rounds. Stay tuned, as we’ll be heating up our draft coverage over the next two weeks.
 
Last edited: