- Joined
- May 8, 2014
- Messages
- 39,703
I haven’t looked at the numbers but I feel like the run D has been pretty good, and teams are testing it. I think folks are being too critical of Wags. He’s lost a step, yeah. He’s not prime Wags. Didn’t we know that coming in?
How good do you think Jackson is? Are we pencilling him in the rest of the season & for 23 with Bruss opposite? Might actually be a physical interior.Also and btw if I am McVay I am asking my OL coach the question of how we got to the point where we started Shelton at RG when Jackson is clearly superior.
He may already know the answer to that. But I think starting the wrong guy was part of what got Kromes fired.
Possibly starting the ‘wrong’ player is not exclusively an OL issue.Also and btw if I am McVay I am asking my OL coach the question of how we got to the point where we started Shelton at RG when Jackson is clearly superior.
He may already know the answer to that. But I think starting the wrong guy was part of what got Kromes fired.
What’s his option with Rapp? Burgess?Possibly starting the ‘wrong’ player is not exclusively an OL issue.
What about starting Rapp?
Yeah I think so. Or maybe LG so that his feet don't get fucked up for if we need him at LT.How good do you think Jackson is? Are we pencilling him in the rest of the season & for 23 with Bruss opposite? Might actually be a physical interior.
Please don't get @Kupped started.Possibly starting the ‘wrong’ player is not exclusively an OL issue.
What about starting Rapp?
Rapp isn’t a hill I’m gonna die on.
Great point about moving him to LG. I assume Edwards is gone.. Rams have 4 solid guard candidates on the roster. If Arcuri can be a reasonable RT… they actually don’t have to draft anyone.. but I wouldn’t mind a bigger center.Yeah I think so. Or maybe LG so that his feet don't get fucked up for if we need him at LT.
Edwards is probably gone in FA so that LG spot should be open too.
Burgess isn't good enough. I don't think he's a factor. If we see him in a primary role we're up shit creek.Rapp isn’t a hill I’m gonna die on.
I just hope Burgess or Yeast are ready. You’ve said Burgess doesn’t have enough dog in him… let’s hope he got some canine transfusion lol.
Well.. Fuller is out. I didn’t see if he was still on field for Deebo TD.Burgess isn't good enough. I don't think he's a factor. If we see him in a primary role we're up shit creek.
Fuller is my guy. He's not been the same player under Raheem that he was under Staley, and that happens with safeties because that's a position where you can be asked to do a crazy range of shit and some just fit better with some game callers. You can put them in the same scheme but the call itself can put more or less load on a guy and so sometimes fit is a problem.
But Rapp needs to be in a more classic SS role. Not playing over the top ever. He is a problem and will continue to be so until they replace him. So what I'd tell Raheem is play Fuller and just try to call it to his strengths as much as possible. Rapp is not working so I doubt Fuller will be worse.
And if he cannot accept Fuller then it's Yeast or bust. Preseason Yeast rose to the occasion and did some good things, so maybe he can help us. Only way to know is see how he handles the situations but as a rook he's gonna learn things the hard way, we all do.
Yeah. "We need to prioritize OL in next year's draft" is about 3 years too late; OL is something you have to develop in advance.Only comment I'd make re: drafting 2 every year is remember you have to be able to make spots for them on the roster. So maybe every other year or as needed is a better approach, where you always draft if there is any question. It would be nice to see this team field a more dominant front.
I think it was even worse last season in the first game too. That stunt that they run with Bosa going to the inside ate up both Hav & Corbs in that game. It was even uglier than this last one IMO. And the Rams playing better in the successive games vs them changed the equation.Those D line stunts really messed with our OL.
I was thinking the spots taken in the top 4 rounds could replace the ones leaving or injured a lot or just not playing well (Blythe) and the one's taken in the later rounds goes on the practice squad. How many of our practice squad OL are UDFA's? But yeah maybe we always take one in the later rounds for practice squad purposes and one every other year in the first 4 rounds for maintenance purposes with maybe another one taken in the first 4 rounds in the off years when we are losing someone.I think this year's OL group was a bit light and we discussed that during the offseason and prior to the final cuts. So yeah they should have done a bit more for the unit, given that they went the budget route at LT with Boom. And I'm not knocking Boom. But the way things went down a little more investment on the interior would have been wise.
The Bruss injury really hurt because we already felt a little short in the depth quality. That was a real kick in the nuts.
Only comment I'd make re: drafting 2 every year is remember you have to be able to make spots for them on the roster. So maybe every other year or as needed is a better approach, where you always draft if there is any question. It would be nice to see this team field a more dominant front.
I think the Rams should carry 9 maybe even 10 OL and reduce their WR by 1 and another position group by 1 (not sure which one) - heck they could have reduced their WR group this year by 2. Although McCutcheon would have been a goner for sure. And you know who else I would have dropped because we would never have gotten him if we had gone a different direction in the draft in 2021.What I'm saying is that it's not the problem right now. Math.
Rams only carried 8 OL... and one of them was Evans.. who wouldn't have been there, most likely, if Bruss hadn't gotten hurt.
I can understand if the argument is that you just don't think they devote enough resources to the Oline and that the overall quality isn't good enough.. maybe Edwards wouldn't be the starter.. maybe Allen would be the backup.. but the number of injuries have wiped out the on-roster depth. Period.
Once you're on practice squad, you're fair game for the rest of the league.
That third string center was on the practice squad.. if he was "good".. he would've been poached by another team.
So, no.. it's not a depth and draft issue at the moment. When they were playing with Shelton, Jackson and Edwards.. backups at two positions.. one of them the 4th guard.. they were doing a decent job.
They gave up one sack to the Falcons and one sack to the Cardinals.. that's fine.. especially for backups including a 4th stringer.
Seems fair… and maybe they were going to carry 9 before Bruss got hurt.I think the Rams should carry 9 maybe even 10 OL and reduce their WR by 1 and another position group by 1 (not sure which one) - heck they could have reduced their WR group this year by 2. Although McCutcheon would have been a goner for sure. And you know who else I would have dropped because we would never have gotten him if we had gone a different direction in the draft in 2021.
Yeah Evans at LG - ickSeems fair… and maybe they were going to carry 9 before Bruss got hurt.
Evans as #9 doesn’t seem like the worst plan in the world… but at left guard… yikes.
I’ll add.. I think the group they brought into the season… including Bruss… was solid. Still feel that way.
Once you get to 3rd & 4th string, idk.
Other than Tutu… the draft picks have made sense, imo.