OFFICIAL 2025 NFL News: Trades, cuts, free agency, and more

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

André

Always far too invested
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
1,668
Will the Rams make a run at LB CJ Mosely from the Jets?
I think it depends on how much he would cost. If he came in at the veteran minimum, it might be worthwhile. I'd be more tempted to wait out the draft and see what we have when it wraps up.
 

Neil039

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 3, 2020
Messages
4,457
But isn’t it nice that the chatter is not about us at this point? I hope it goes on until he signs late and then tries to recruit some of his former receivers or linemen.

I love the circus as it just means he has someone desperate enough to take on his side show. We just know it won’t be us.

Or do we?
The real win it's not the Rams in the circus anymore.

I agree with @dieterbrock it would be hilarious if the Steelers and Giants went another route besides Wilson and Rodgers.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
24,085
No doubt we need to draft another CB period but Williams is still a starter in this league. Would be insane to cut our DB room experience until we know for sure we got some good ones.
Yeah. Even if they drafted a corner in round one, there is no way to know if he will be able play well enough yo make Williams expendable. There’s no reason to starters that are under contract without knowing for certain that you can adequately replace them
 

LA_Rams_#29

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 15, 2017
Messages
1,383
Name
LA Rams 29
No doubt we need to draft another CB period but Williams is still a starter in this league. Would be insane to cut our DB room experience until we know for sure we got some good ones.
I see where you're coming from...I'll say this.... if cutting D. Will doesn't save us any money, then yeah, we're likely better off keeping him.

From my perspective though,.... hypothetically..... If we drafted a guy like Darien Porter out of Iowa Stat in the 3rd round.... 6'3... ran a 4.3 40 yd draft.... if your 4 CBs were Witherspoon, Durant, Emmanuel Forbes, and Darien Porter..... Lake plays a lot of CB in coverage for us as well... It might be a stretch, but I wouldn't be mad at that..... Forbes is a much better fit for us than he became in Washington.
 

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
7,143
But isn’t it nice that the chatter is not about us at this point? I hope it goes on until he signs late and then tries to recruit some of his former receivers or linemen.

I love the circus as it just means he has someone desperate enough to take on his side show. We just know it won’t be us.

Or do we?
I mean, him in Pitt with those two receivers, I can't wait.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,921
I dunno about Rogers. He clearly is not the MVP caliber Rogers anymore. But I've seen him a few times last year. He's still got some mobility. The arms looks good enough. And he's got a high football IQ for the position. Pittsburgh would seem like the best fit. They always have a winning season but can't go far if they make the playoffs because of the quarterback. They have a couple talented receivers in Pickens and Metcalf. I can see Rogers going out on a winning note if he signs with Pittsburgh.
I think with a QB of Rogers talent the give-a-fuck will run out before his arm isn't good enough any more. He's still got enough arm.

This is where Stafford is a better QB. I think he's still hungry to cement that gold jacket. Rogers has always been a weird dude, it's why he went off the board later than he should have in the draft. But I think he's close to saying fuck it.
 

DzRams

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
1,567
Name
Desmal M
Yeah. Even if they drafted a corner in round one, there is no way to know if he will be able play well enough yo make Williams expendable. There’s no reason to starters that are under contract without knowing for certain that you can adequately replace them
At this point we've filled needs to such a degree that whoever we draft will likely not start immediately with the exception of LB.
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,944
Name
Scott
At this point we've filled needs to such a degree that whoever we draft will likely not start immediately with the exception of LB.
Agree, and even at CB, not sure there is a huge diff between a CB taken at 26 vs ones available at 90, or earlier in rd 3 if they trade up to target a guy in the 70's.

So pick 26 could be used on anything. If I had my way they trade back to 30 or 31, (maybe KC moves up for the last OT worthy of a rd 1 pick). Then at 31 you take Shough. That type of trade might get you KCs 2nd or their 3rd & 5th. Or a 2nd and a pick next yr.. Can do some more damage with those picks while still taking that swing at QB.
 

El Chapo Jr

Legend
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
6,261
I see where you're coming from...I'll say this.... if cutting D. Will doesn't save us any money, then yeah, we're likely better off keeping him.

From my perspective though,.... hypothetically..... If we drafted a guy like Darien Porter out of Iowa Stat in the 3rd round.... 6'3... ran a 4.3 40 yd draft.... if your 4 CBs were Witherspoon, Durant, Emmanuel Forbes, and Darien Porter..... Lake plays a lot of CB in coverage for us as well... It might be a stretch, but I wouldn't be mad at that..... Forbes is a much better fit for us than he became in Washington.
Forbes is a huge unknown and frankly scares the shit out of me with his scrawny ass frame. Relying solely on rookies is bad planning. Now if we draft some and we hit to the point where Williams becomes expendable then that's understandable. However I find this scenario completely unlikely since the more CBs we have the better. Besides Williams would make a fine 2/3 CB if we somehow pick some legit CBs in the draft.
 

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
7,143
I see where you're coming from...I'll say this.... if cutting D. Will doesn't save us any money, then yeah, we're likely better off keeping him.

From my perspective though,.... hypothetically..... If we drafted a guy like Darien Porter out of Iowa Stat in the 3rd round.... 6'3... ran a 4.3 40 yd draft.... if your 4 CBs were Witherspoon, Durant, Emmanuel Forbes, and Darien Porter..... Lake plays a lot of CB in coverage for us as well... It might be a stretch, but I wouldn't be mad at that..... Forbes is a much better fit for us than he became in Washington.
just wants to cut the best cover corner we had last year

amazing
 

DzRams

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
1,567
Name
Desmal M
just wants to cut the best cover corner we had last year

amazing
PFF rated Witherspoon slightly above Williams but both were solidly average. Durant was rated in the same territory, too. Nothing special about any of our CBs.
 

So Ram

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
15,807
PFF rated Witherspoon slightly above Williams but both were solidly average. Durant was rated in the same territory, too. Nothing special about any of our CBs.
We saw this group grow together lastď season Spoon shut down 2 of the best WR’s in the playoffs
 

DzRams

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
1,567
Name
Desmal M
in coverage???
Yes. Here are the coverage ratings for our secondary:

Curl 63.7
Witherspoon 62.6
Jaylen McCollough 61.6
Durant 61.5
Williams 59.8
Lake 58.4

Note that 60.0 through 70 is average. So all of these guys are pretty much right at league average. It wouldn't be earth-shattering to move off of any one of them because they are all JAGS.
 

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
7,143
Yes. Here are the coverage ratings for our secondary:

Curl 63.7
Witherspoon 62.6
Jaylen McCollough 61.6
Durant 61.5
Williams 59.8
Lake 58.4

Note that 60.0 through 70 is average. So all of these guys are pretty much right at league average. It wouldn't be earth-shattering to move off of any one of them because they are all JAGS.
Weird, when I look at PFF Williams is at 61.5 coverage and Spoon is 58.8

Are these from elsewhere?

But agree, they're all JAGS, I would argue that Williams at least is consistent in a way that Spoon is not and because of the variance year to year with all CBs (including top ones) it's worth betting Williams can have a year closer to 2023 where he was a monster vs 2024.

I think you keep him for that alone, though CB is where the wheels can fall off for sure.
 

DzRams

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
1,567
Name
Desmal M
Weird, when I look at PFF Williams is at 61.5 coverage and Spoon is 58.8

Are these from elsewhere?

But agree, they're all JAGS, I would argue that Williams at least is consistent in a way that Spoon is not and because of the variance year to year with all CBs (including top ones) it's worth betting Williams can have a year closer to 2023 where he was a monster vs 2024.

I think you keep him for that alone, though CB is where the wheels can fall off for sure.
Nah, it's PFF. I figured it out. You are looking at the regular season stats and I was looking at the regular and post-season stats. Either way, there's not much daylight between the numbers.

I hear you on Williams being more consistent and year-to-year variance. OTOH, I wouldn't bet that a 32 year old skill position player will trend the other direction. (Spoon is younger; 30 tomorrow.) It's the same reason they traded Kupp. But I'm fine with keeping all of them until the end of TC to let the pecking order sort itself out.
 

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
7,143
Nah, it's PFF. I figured it out. You are looking at the regular season stats and I was looking at the regular and post-season stats. Either way, there's not much daylight between the numbers.

I hear you on Williams being more consistent and year-to-year variance. OTOH, I wouldn't bet that a 32 year old skill position player will trend the other direction. (Spoon is younger; 30 tomorrow.) It's the same reason they traded Kupp. But I'm fine with keeping all of them until the end of TC to let the pecking order sort itself out.
Oh that's fascinating and gives some credence to those who say it's an effort issue with Spoon, like he's turning it on and off.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
24,085
Yes. Here are the coverage ratings for our secondary:

Curl 63.7
Witherspoon 62.6
Jaylen McCollough 61.6
Durant 61.5
Williams 59.8
Lake 58.4

Note that 60.0 through 70 is average. So all of these guys are pretty much right at league average. It wouldn't be earth-shattering to move off of any one of them because they are all JAGS.

I rate them above a JAG. A JAG is more a below average player. Reeder is a Jag. Rozeboom is a Jag. But Speights was an average LBer.

I think the DBs are solid contributors that fit the overloaded upfront defense that the Rams employ. It’s tough to pay stars at every position.