Your Controversial Rams Takes

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Faceplant

Still celebrating Superbowl LVI
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Pick'em Champion
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
9,984
Sam Bradford could’ve been the greatest QB in our history, were it not for injuries and horrid coaching.

Steven Jackson was our best running back, and should be in the Hall.
Love ya Mem, but you will hate my controversial take here...

Sammy the Sleeves was little more than a checkdown Charlie with twigs for legs and SJax was HAPPY to be a big fish in a cesspool back then and didn't care about winning. Hate me!!! :fistbump1:

My more optimistic takes have already been......taken :) but this one bears repeating....

The 2001 Rams were the best NFL team I have ever seen.....
 

gabriel18

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
5,076
This might now qualify for the tread , but here’s a scenario.
Would you guys take another magical Super Bowl run this year , if it meant Stafford , Donald and Kupp would retire after the win ?
I think I might
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,680
This might now qualify for the tread , but here’s a scenario.
Would you guys take another magical Super Bowl run this year , if it meant Stafford , Donald and Kupp would retire after the win ?
I think I might
Hell yes. Titles are worth everything. Another one would cement Stafford in the Hall as well.
 

Ram_Rally

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
5,957
This might now qualify for the tread , but here’s a scenario.
Would you guys take another magical Super Bowl run this year , if it meant Stafford , Donald and Kupp would retire after the win ?
I think I might
Damn, good question. Because if they lose this year they may actually be set up better for 24 and 25 if they stayed. I genuinely don't know.
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
30,544
I have a couple of weird takes.....

1. Carrol Rosenbloom was a dirty owner and could have been killed by the mafia.

Before he owned the Rams, he owned the Baltimore Colts. There were rumors that he bet on his team, but the biggest allegation was that his team threw Super Bowl III vs the Jets. Rozelle commented that the Colts loss was the best thing that could have happened because the Super Bowl concept was in danger if the AFL was whipped again in that game.
We all know that Rosenbloom never swam in the ocean without another person, except on the day he drowned. Figures were seen in the water near where he drowned that looked like wet suits, but there is no proof of that.

2. Marshall Faulk was a better RB for the Rams, especially in the playoffs, than Eric Dickerson.

Faulk's critical role in two Rams Super Bowl appearances along with the path to both, should be evidence enough. He didn't gain as many yards on the ground as ED did, of course, but Marshall was a multifaceted weapon. During GSOT, he was every bit of a WR as he was a RB. As a RB, imagine Kyren Williams with an extra gear which Marshall had. I think Faulk was the most complete offensive weapon I've seen since 1969.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,680
1. Carrol Rosenbloom was a dirty owner and could have been killed by the mafia.
conspiracy-charlie-day.gif
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,680
2. Marshall Faulk was a better RB for the Rams, especially in the playoffs, than Eric Dickerson.
Truth. But what would it have looked like if Dickerson had a QB and a roster built by Vermiel.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,680
He would have needed to find an undrafted HOFer at QB to pair with ED.
"We can just get Pat Haden to come out of retirement."
~ Unnamed RoD poster
 

Dodgersrf

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
11,340
Name
Scott
This might now qualify for the tread , but here’s a scenario.
Would you guys take another magical Super Bowl run this year , if it meant Stafford , Donald and Kupp would retire after the win ?
I think I might
I wouldn’t.
I’ll keep them and win the next two Superbowls after the oline and secondary are replenished.
 

Alaskan Ram

Last Frontier Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
1,184
This might now qualify for the tread , but here’s a scenario.
Would you guys take another magical Super Bowl run this year , if it meant Stafford , Donald and Kupp would retire after the win ?
I think I might
Throw in defeating the 9ers in the playoffs en route to that Title and I'm in.
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
12,173
New takes? No. But I know many think differently.


1. Kurt warner should have never been traded. Bulger should have been the one traded when time and value peaked.

I'm sorry, Kurt did have an ego and I think eventually him and Martz got to a breaking point after he got hurt that made him expendable with the emergence of Marc Bulger. Obviously Marc was a good QB. but he didn't have the instincts or clutch ability that Kurt did.

2. 2003 NFL playoffs, if we don't lose in OT to Steve Smiths walk off TD we get to the NFCCG beat Philly and go on to the SB to rematch the Cheatriots. I have no idea if we win that matchup, but I truly feel we would have been SB bound that year and matched up good with the cheatriots.
 

Dodgersrf

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
11,340
Name
Scott
2. 2003 NFL playoffs, if we don't lose in OT to Steve Smiths walk off TD we get to the NFCCG beat Philly and go on to the SB to rematch the Cheatriots
That playoff game against Carolina, was one of the most intense games I’ve ever seen.
It was a crazy good game.
It still hurts a bit, that we didn’t end up with the W, though.
 

henry dyer

UDFA
Joined
Aug 15, 2023
Messages
57
Name
Billy Wanger
taking the opening kickoff driving 79 yards then having dempsey's kick blocked and bobby bryant score
finally getting home field advantage against vikings and it is a mud bowl
watching jim nettles try to stop viking gene washington
george allen punting on third down in the old coastal divison game against bears ,, forgetting how many downs they had
rod perry waving at the air as stallworth runs away
dieter brock throwing balls against the bears that were off on the x axis y axis and z axis
scouting lawrence phillips
 

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,841
New takes? No. But I know many think differently.


1. Kurt warner should have never been traded. Bulger should have been the one traded when time and value peaked.

I'm sorry, Kurt did have an ego and I think eventually him and Martz got to a breaking point after he got hurt that made him expendable with the emergence of Marc Bulger. Obviously Marc was a good QB. but he didn't have the instincts or clutch ability that Kurt did.

2. 2003 NFL playoffs, if we don't lose in OT to Steve Smiths walk off TD we get to the NFCCG beat Philly and go on to the SB to rematch the Cheatriots. I have no idea if we win that matchup, but I truly feel we would have been SB bound that year and matched up good with the cheatriots.


I think many on the board side with you on number one.

I strongly believe Bulger over Warner was the right move though and I think that's the more controversial take here
 

HitStick

Van Jefferson’s #1 fan
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
2,567
Sam Bradford would be a top QB and likely still playing if McVay was his head coach back then