Yes, the Rams may be in the QB draft market (no tanking required)

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Tano

Legend
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
10,009
Penix has talent but I absolutely hate his throwing motion. He better be taught by someone to improve that throwing motion.
 

madrid311

RomandeacondickersonolsenwarnerStafforddonaldkupp
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
501
Name
Madrid311
we need to draft other than QB with our higher picks.

Stafford is 35 and turning 36... but Rodgers is almost 40.... brady was 44

Staffords contract is a dead cap monster for 2-3 more years.

Our best bet is to ride with him for a couple more years.

I know some people don't want to hear that and I get it - but its the most logical move forward.
then we better cover hid blind side, front side, side side and back side better.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
22,999
Name
Dennis
Unless they are trading up into the bottom of the 1st round for someone I'm not seeing yet, I agree wholeheartedly.
I disagree because I like J.J. McCarthy over Drake Maye, but that will play it self out in the coming weeks and after McCarthy wins a National Title.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,036
Penix has talent but I absolutely hate his throwing motion. He better be taught by someone to improve that throwing motion.
Totally agree. I'm not drafting a qb round 1 that will require a complete mechanics overhaul. Ewers from Texas needs work also
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,036
I disagree because I like J.J. McCarthy over Drake Maye, but that will play it self out in the coming weeks and after McCarthy wins a National Title.
Not seeing what you see in McCarthy. He mostly plays cream puffs and most of his throws are conservative or to wide open receivers. I was at the Rutgers game last year and they had him rattled. Not to mention his turnovers in the TCU game.
Sure he's got the measurables, but I havent seen him put the team on his back and carry them to a win.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
22,999
Name
Dennis
Sure he's got the measurables, but I havent seen him put the team on his back and carry them to a win.
He did that against Ohio State. Keep an eye on him against Penn State this weekend. He is very smart and extends plays, but also keeps his eyes downfield in the process. Again I believe he will pick up more steam as they defeat better competition.

And FWIW I would love to be wrong and watch him self destruct against Ohio State, but that is not happening, similar to how I felt about Brett Rypien.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,036
He did that against Ohio State.
He was ok in that game, nothing special. Threw short all day. Nothing next level in that game for sure. Worth a look as a mid rounder due to his size but a first rounder? Heck no
 

snackdaddy

Who's your snackdaddy?
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
12,091
Name
Charlie
If they think the next run of playoff years starts next year, I think they'd do better to draft a left tackle or edge rusher and sign a veteran backup to Stafford. If they think 2024 is still in rebuild mode, then yeah, look for your future quarterback now.
 
Last edited:

oldnotdead

Legend
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
5,406
Unless Stafford gives them a retirement timeline, I think we continue to build around him.

I think both parties agreed upon his signing of the extension it would be after the 2024 season. You can see that by the contract structure. They added additional years to simply give him a manageable cap number. Matt's continuous injury issue is only getting worse. Frankly I don't think the Rams or Stafford is looking beyond 2024 for that reason.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,036
I think both parties agreed upon his signing of the extension it would be after the 2024 season. You can see that by the contract structure. They added additional years to simply give him a manageable cap number. Matt's continuous injury issue is only getting worse. Frankly I don't think the Rams or Stafford is looking beyond 2024 for that reason.
Well, that's not true one bit.
10 mill of his 2025 salary becomes guaranteed 3rd day of 2024 thus puts the dead cap for 2025 around 37 mill
Stafford is in it for the long haul, unless he wants to give back some of that signing bonus
 

AvengerRam

Benevolent Troublemaker
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
5,375
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #74
As I noted in my first post, I don't favor taking a QB in the first round.

That said, there are some cogent arguments for doing so.

If the Rams find themselves with a Top 15 pick in a fairly deep QB draft class, they may have a unique opportunity to get a true franchise player. Even if he sits for a couple of years behind Stafford (we should be so lucky as to have Stafford available for 34 consecutive regular season games), it could be a great move for our long-term success.

I would, of course, feel a lot better about doing so if the Rams first fill some more immediate needs in the free agency market.
 

NYCRam

Rookie
Joined
Oct 22, 2023
Messages
184
As I noted in my first post, I don't favor taking a QB in the first round.

That said, there are some cogent arguments for doing so.

If the Rams find themselves with a Top 15 pick in a fairly deep QB draft class, they may have a unique opportunity to get a true franchise player. Even if he sits for a couple of years behind Stafford (we should be so lucky as to have Stafford available for 34 consecutive regular season games), it could be a great move for our long-term success.

I would, of course, feel a lot better about doing so if the Rams first fill some more immediate needs in the free agency market.
And we have to figure that our draft pick the next year (25) will be lower than the one this year. Figuring in the cap space and full complement of draft picks we have coming up this off season. This might be the year to take our next franchise QB, regardless of if he sits for a year or two.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,036
Unless they are trading up into the bottom of the 1st round for someone I'm not seeing yet, I agree wholeheartedly.
Back at ya. Trading back in to the late 1st round is a smart play as it buys that 5th year option
 

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
6,241
I disagree because I like J.J. McCarthy over Drake Maye, but that will play it self out in the coming weeks and after McCarthy wins a National Title.
Wow. Maye's the best QB in college football... but we'll see if that remains by end of year.
 

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
6,241
Hard to know what Rams should do without knowing what players are there (and who those players are after the next three months) but it sure seems like a highly rated WR, OT, QB, TE, DE will most likely be there for us where we pick.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
22,999
Name
Dennis
Wow. Maye's the best QB in college football... but we'll see if that remains by end of year.
Now, please don't take this the wrong way, have you watched a whole game that Drake Maye has played?
 

GoodBadUgly

Gridiron Sage
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
1,961
Name
Phil
I still think I like Penix the best out of them all, but agree his throwing motion disturbs me. But I don't understand how when he throws it, the ball seems to magically teleport to the perfect spot.

Who's to say that won't happen in the NFL? If someone drafts him expecting to change his mechanics, they're dumbasses.