He can separate. But he seems to get hurt a lot.I would target Pierce from the Colts.
He is bigger so McVay may actually use him as the deep threat that is missing from this O.
A real threat that will open things up underneath as well.
He can separate. But he seems to get hurt a lot.I would target Pierce from the Colts.
He is bigger so McVay may actually use him as the deep threat that is missing from this O.
A real threat that will open things up underneath as well.
Agree.For me our depth is weak at WR and we need to plan for post Adams. It would be GREAT to get a rookie mentoring with him and Nacua.
That’s exactly what I was thinking. Love Stafford but having a mobile QB can put the extra stress on a defense. Our edge defenders have to be extremely careful not to overrun or give the edge up to mobile QB’s so it takes a little of the steam off the edge. Stafford had opportunities to pick up yards but that’s simply not his game and a consideration for defenders against the Rams. They know where he’s going to be in the pocket and also know he’s not going to run. I suspect Maye will be able to get a lot of cheap yardage against the Seahawks if they don’t commit a defender outside of their front 4 to guard against the QB run which will take away a defender from coverage. Mobile QB’s have been the future for awhile. Stafford does so many things well but mobility isn’t his game.one limitation of not having a mobile Qb - you are not afraid of him running it in if you drop everyone into coverage.
I think Tate's been listed a bit high on different sites I've seen. I don't think he's better than Tyson or Lemon. So he's in play for the Rams I think, as is Boston.If it it makes you feel any better JB Long was asked who he thought the Rams were going to draft early about a month ago, he said without hesitation a WR. Not sure what inside info he has but that was his immediate answer. Here are some names to consider.
![]()
Wide Receiver Rankings 2026 NFL Draft
Wide Receiver s prospect rankings for the 2026 NFL Draft. Breakdowns of the best Wide Receiver prospects and averages of other scouting reports.www.nfldraftbuzz.com
Maybe wait until RD 2 for a guy like Lane or Fields. Might only get him if they trade back from 29 and get additional picks for a higher rd 2 pick. Then grab one of those big WRs.I think Tate's been listed a bit high on different sites I've seen. I don't think he's better than Tyson or Lemon. So he's in play for the Rams I think, as is Boston.
When you ask what traits in a big wideout are best for the Rams, my answer is hands and contested ability. And of the wideouts that slot in the first few rounds my preference list is Boston > Lane. Also of those two I think it's pretty close. And I think both are close to Tate. There is not some big drop from Tate to the others, not to my eye.
Boston is more explosive than Tate. And he's better in contested catches.
Lane has freakishly good hands. Rare hands. And he is underrated in body control and ability to position to use those hands.
I really think Lane's gonna be a star in the NFL. But I'd take Boston first because I think he'd help us quicker.
Tyson might be there when they pick and he is a baller. His injury history is quite scary though missed 48% of his games. Usually injured in college is even more injured in the NFL. Lemon probably will be there and I believe he will be everything they hoped Tutu would be plus a special teams demon. He could very will be the 13th pick. Taking a WR at 13 is not necessarily my preference will depend on how the board falls, Les has not contacted me yet to get my input though. LOL!I think Tate's been listed a bit high on different sites I've seen. I don't think he's better than Tyson or Lemon. So he's in play for the Rams I think, as is Boston.
When you ask what traits in a big wideout are best for the Rams, my answer is hands and contested ability. And of the wideouts that slot in the first few rounds my preference list is Boston > Lane. Also of those two I think it's pretty close. And I think both are close to Tate. There is not some big drop from Tate to the others, not to my eye.
Boston is more explosive than Tate. And he's better in contested catches.
Lane has freakishly good hands. Rare hands. And he is underrated in body control and ability to position to use those hands.
I really think Lane's gonna be a star in the NFL. But I'd take Boston first because I think he'd help us quicker.
I thought the same thing. It's fourth down and the season is on the line. Stafford threw to Ferg en route right where the DB was. He should have just lofted it up to have the very athletic, 6'5" Ferg go up and get it. At least there was a chance instead of no chance at all.I’ve seen Detroit call a qb draw in that situation and he can’t be much faster than Stafford. Also, the pass Ferg didn’t seem high enough and why not have Parkinson running that back line and just throw it up.
I didn't realize he missed that many games. All I knew was every time I looked at his QB I was like "who the F is that WR?"Tyson might be there when they pick and he is a baller. His injury history is quite scary though missed 48% of his games. Usually injured in college is even more injured in the NFL. Lemon probably will be there and I believe he will be everything they hoped Tutu would be plus a special teams demon. He could very will be the 13th pick. Taking a WR at 13 is not necessarily my preference will depend on how the board falls, Les has not contacted me yet to get my input though. LOL!
Thing about Lane is he's got catches nobody else makes. And I imagine him with Stafford feeding him in the redzone and 4 minute and it's glorious.Maybe wait until RD 2 for a guy like Lane or Fields. Might only get him if they trade back from 29 and get additional picks for a higher rd 2 pick. Then grab one of those big WRs.
So......he would fit right in, haha.He can separate. But he seems to get hurt a lot.
They've done pretty well finding WRs in later rounds (Kupp = 3rd and Puka = 5th).
Whittington has promise. So does Mumpfield. And I think they'll keep using the 13 set, which means less WR usage.
This team needs defensive help in the D-backfield and LB (Landman came back to earth and Speights was middling).
Well maybe when LaFleur gets the Cards gig he can take him with him.Which all brings us around to what the hell is going on with Tutu Atwell.
I think Tate's been listed a bit high on different sites I've seen. I don't think he's better than Tyson or Lemon. So he's in play for the Rams I think, as is Boston.
When you ask what traits in a big wideout are best for the Rams, my answer is hands and contested ability. And of the wideouts that slot in the first few rounds my preference list is Boston > Lane. Also of those two I think it's pretty close. And I think both are close to Tate. There is not some big drop from Tate to the others, not to my eye.
Boston is more explosive than Tate. And he's better in contested catches.
Lane has freakishly good hands. Rare hands. And he is underrated in body control and ability to position to use those hands.
I really think Lane's gonna be a star in the NFL. But I'd take Boston first because I think he'd help us quicker.
Agree, ergo, get someone who can rush the passer. Hard to believe they will keep Young when so many others on D will get new deals. That or a speed WR. Cooks was the last truly reliable speed WR.The front is supposed to be the strength of this team, they are a big part of why the secondary got exposed the way they did.
Not seeing any burners on the first page.If it it makes you feel any better JB Long was asked who he thought the Rams were going to draft early about a month ago, he said without hesitation a WR. Not sure what inside info he has but that was his immediate answer. Here are some names to consider.
![]()
Wide Receiver Rankings 2026 NFL Draft
Wide Receiver s prospect rankings for the 2026 NFL Draft. Breakdowns of the best Wide Receiver prospects and averages of other scouting reports.www.nfldraftbuzz.com