Isaiah Battle.
I'm pleasantly surprised that the organization didn't keep him over someone who outperformed him.
I'm actually less impressed with our DT depth. We have to have Donald and Brockers play 16 games for us. The drop off is severe.Longacre. I understand Trinca-Pasat, because it's pretty deep on the interior DL.
But I thought Longacre had a shot. Especially when you consider how often GW rotates his DE's inside.
Not to me. I'm perfectly okay with Nick Fairley and Ethan Westbrooks.I'm actually less impressed with our DT depth. We have to have Donald and Brockers play 16 games for us. The drop off is severe.
Not to me. I'm perfectly okay with Nick Fairley and Ethan Westbrooks.
Plus we still have Trinca-Pasat on the PS if need be.
also surprised at Battle - was that just a dumb call to bring him in and use up one of our picks from next year?
Why does everybody keep wondering this? We knew all along the guy needed time. He's still on the team. If we didn't use a pick in the supplemental, whose to say he would have picked to come to the rams? Assuming he would have gotten more interest afterwards. We used a fifth round pick. Big damn deal. If he turns out a solid starter some day or even solid backup, then it's worth it. If not, who gives a crap? It's a fifth round pick. Not exactly a luxury pick.
Well they'd have to pay for him first.Because we OD'd on o-line picks this year, surely the coaching staff are expecting them to be starters for years to come - he can easily be signed off our PS.
One with round pick next year is better than no fifth round pick next year, especially when we're a team far from being full of elite players...
Just saying' is all...
What I never understood was all the interest in Battle to begin with...what am or was I missing? This guy got more print and interest on this blog as an obscure linemen I can ever recall.![]()
Well they'd have to pay for him first.
View: https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/640332762642300928
That, and any team who wants him on will HAVE to sign him to their 53 man roster. If he's too raw to land on a Rams O-line that's pretty much all question marks I don't think any other team is going to be rushing to snatch him up. Also the Rams have the option of making room for him on their 53 man roster and simply plucking him up before anybody can take him.
Don't know why everyone keeps acting like we got caught with our pants down, the Rams have put more thought into this than we have and have shown more commitment to keeping Battle than people are giving them credit for.