I think Keenum has the higher floor, by a little bit..
Goff, by a very wide margin, has the higher ceiling.
I would start Keenum in Seattle... Dress Goff and if Keenum struggles, put Goff in.
Goff starts game 3 against Tampa.
I endorse this message.
I think Keenum has the higher floor, by a little bit..
Goff, by a very wide margin, has the higher ceiling.
I would start Keenum in Seattle... Dress Goff and if Keenum struggles, put Goff in.
Goff starts game 3 against Tampa.
But what about Jon Kitna? Lol
It was truly the best comparison available and hard to dispute (at the time)I guess I gave Keenum too much credit....At this point, IMO, what do we have to lose, but if Fisher was not 100% sold on Goff, this in itself could be the issue and now the question looms, who will replace Jeff Fisher?
Yep, less pressure.
Respectfully, I disagree.
I think it puts more pressure on him.
On the road, hostile environment etc.
I think this thread shows exactly what's wrong with the Rams QB position under the Fisher regime.
Why the heck does anyone care about the highest floor?
Somehow Rams fans have been brainwashed into thinking that "if only we can have a QB avoid losing the game, then our defense and RB is so good we can go better than 7-9!"
I'm sorry, but that's a loser philosophy from the get go. Floor does not matter. In every roster spot the philosophy should be highest ceiling, every player should be employed to help the team win -- not just "not lose".
This is especially true of the QB position, no other person on the field is so able to directly win a game. And somehow we've turned that unique opportunity for winning on its head and squandered it on being giddy over a QB that will "just suck the least"?
The better philosophy is you aim for the highest ceiling, and if the QB is having a bad floor day, THEN you count on your superior defense and elite RB to pick up the slack and win the game.
Respectfully, I disagree.
I think it puts more pressure on him.
On the road, hostile environment etc.
I think there is way less pressure at home as well. I don't think us rams fans will boo him if he makes a mistake after witnessing What happened Monday night.
However, if Fisher starts Keenum again and he plays horrible again, I would not be surprised if fans start chanting "GOFF GOFF GOFF!!!"
I think Keenum has the higher floor, by a little bit..
Goff, by a very wide margin, has the higher ceiling.
I would start Keenum in Seattle... Dress Goff and if Keenum struggles, put Goff in.
Goff starts game 3 against Tampa.
I was right there with ya until you had Goff starting game 3...IMO, he should start when he's ready, wasn't one Bradford enough for a decade? This Kid's not exactly built like Wentz or Newton while this O line remains remains suspect.
My apologies if my post came across as an attack your thread, that wasn't the intent. It was simply venting disbelief at how far away from sanity the Rams starting QB position has drifted.I think you may have only read the title of the thread ...
I still don't get this, there needs to be a new meme like "7-9 ready" or "28-0 ready" or "didn't look like Dan Marino in preseason so can't ever dress ready".I'm assuming he's ready by then. I want them to actively work on getting him ready, not just wait. If he's not ready then I wouldn't play him, but I think he would be.