Is it just me or does anyone else feel good that our weakest link in McLeod is very young and played pretty well near the end of the season? I'm liking our defense.
Once a player signs their tender, that's what they get paid unless they are released. There is no offering less later on. So unless that happens, McLeod is getting $2.356 million.
My point is that a team wouldn't or shouldn't give such a tender for a weak link. Why? Because you don't typically worry about losing a weak link. You take the risk. The Rams not willing to take the risk tells me that they don't see him as a weak link.
I'm not sure who will start but I have a feeling that Barron and McLeod will see quite a bit of action. I got this crazy idea that they might be rotating guys in and out in the secondary similar to how they do it on the line.JJ get's picked on to but McLeod is no Craig Dahl. When was the last time McLeod just literally blew games because his crooked eye had him take the worst angle possible? I'm not saying McLeod is Charles Woodson but he's not as bad as everybody makes him out to be. Either way I think it's a moot point since Barron takes the job this season. It will be interesting to see how it plays out.