Where we at?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

dang

Legend
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
8,049
CB1
ILB1
TE
RB1
WR
Can’t get a CB1 and RB1 via the draft with our current picks as we only have 1 first round pick and 0 2nd round picks. IMO that’s where the CB1 and RB1 picks are aligned. Trading picks (down/up) could work but would be reliant on a couple trade partners.
 

DzRams

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
1,572
Name
Desmal M
In order of importance for me:

LB - I still maintain, McVay fixes problems that end our season, and this IMO was the biggest reason Barkley ran all over us

T - depth but also for Rob next year

WR - both Adams and Tutu are basically here for a year

CB - I put down on the list because from a bodies perspective, we don't really need one. It would be nice to upgrade the room, but that will depend on the right player being there in the first or third round

TE

RB (doesn't look like we will be keeping Rivers unless I missed something) - but this can be late

The first four would be with our first four picks - TE/RB/WR/LB with our four 6th rounders
My list is very much like yours but I slide LB down because the Rams have not prioritized the position and until they do, I'm not expecting them to.

T - one of the worst things that happened last year was our tackles being out. Upgraded depth here and future starter is a must.
WR Same reasons you list plus we don't know for sure what we can count on Tutu for.
CB / LB - Same level of priority.
TE
RB
Safety - We have two free agents next year and they tend to draft needs a year early.
 

FrantikRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
4,963
Why is our salary cap info not updated yet? Annoying
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,945
Name
Scott
My list is very much like yours but I slide LB down because the Rams have not prioritized the position and until they do, I'm not expecting them to.

T - one of the worst things that happened last year was our tackles being out. Upgraded depth here and future starter is a must.
WR Same reasons you list plus we don't know for sure what we can count on Tutu for.
CB / LB - Same level of priority.
TE
RB
Safety - We have two free agents next year and they tend to draft needs a year early.


This is an excerpt from Jourdan's article on the Poona Ford signing...

"The Rams allowed 100-plus yards rushing in all but four games last season, and the coaching staff and front office made shoring that up a priority this spring."

This would make one think that without an ILB signing in FA, that it will be prioritized in the draft. No?
 

DzRams

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
1,572
Name
Desmal M
This is an excerpt from Jourdan's article on the Poona Ford signing...

"The Rams allowed 100-plus yards rushing in all but four games last season, and the coaching staff and front office made shoring that up a priority this spring."

This would make one think that without an ILB signing in FA, that it will be prioritized in the draft. No?
From absorbing everything that I've heard from Jourdan, it sounds like the Rams wanted a run stuffer on the DL as the biggest answer to their run defense woes last year. That's what the Ford signing was all about.

I'm sure they'll draft some ILB but that doesn't necessarily mean a deviation from their established draft philosophy of getting that position later.
 

So Ram

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
15,812
This is an excerpt from Jourdan's article on the Poona Ford signing...

"The Rams allowed 100-plus yards rushing in all but four games last season, and the coaching staff and front office made shoring that up a priority this spring."

This would make one think that without an ILB signing in FA, that it will be prioritized in the draft. No?

HECH YEAH - they got burned last year !!! EJ53 wasn’t the player they wanted for the future.

Amy Ram Fan that doesn’t think a MLB is going to be a top priority real is missing your post exactly.

Les Snead & the Olgetree draft pick is an example.Is Rosenboom even resigned. What Ram Fans think Troy Reeder is coming back to start ?
-Of course let’s count on a UDRFA again ??? I won’t say Speight will be a backup,just that The Rams need speed in the middle.
I’m sure Les will work some magic.

Yes with Havenstein going to be a FA,a swing OT might be a Top priority & added depth.

I’ll go on record to say at least by Raheem Morris’s 101 pick The Rams draft a MLB in 2025.
 

Flint

Pro Bowler
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,649
Here's a question you might be able to answer for me....

With zone coverage becoming more and more the trend, do we want to spend hight draft pick capital on a CB, vs taking a very good OT to replace Big Rob and possibly start at LT and move AJ Jackson over to RT?? Things I openly wonder about.
Now don't get me wrong I would be happy w/ a CB in Rd 1, but Snead is so good mining CBs in mid to late picks
Finding starting OTs on day 2/3 is a lower % chance of hitting. I mean AJ Jackson was winning the lotto but that won't happen again imho

What says you???
I like it, it’s not sexy or splashy but if the last few years are any indication we’re going to have to use backups on the oline at some point early in the season and there’s not much news on Boom lately. So we get a more reliable backup and a successor to Hav.
 

Flint

Pro Bowler
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,649
no linebacker is stopping Barkley.

If they are strong enough they aren't fast enough - if they have the speed they won't have the strength.

You have to stop Barkley at the 1st level - once he gets to the back 7 it's trouble.
I agree you need to get Barkley early but it didn’t seem like Roseboom was able to identify the gap and meet him there. If you can get hands on him near the los then help can come as opposed to trying to get him in space.
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,945
Name
Scott
From absorbing everything that I've heard from Jourdan, it sounds like the Rams wanted a run stuffer on the DL as the biggest answer to their run defense woes last year. That's what the Ford signing was all about.

I'm sure they'll draft some ILB but that doesn't necessarily mean a deviation from their established draft philosophy of getting that position later.
Adapt or die...
 

DzRams

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
1,572
Name
Desmal M
Adapt or die...
I hear you. Their draft philosophy may need some tweaks. I suspect though that they put the explosive run issue last year on 1) Needing a better NT as the DL is the first and most important line of defense, 2) Lack of containment by the OLB, and 3) an ILB with more range.

They just improved #1.

#2 was a real problem in the beginning of the year (mostly Verse) but got better as the young guys improved.

#3 would be great to have but doesn't mean they'll move it to such a high priority that they use a 1st on it. The pendulum may be swinging some back to a running emphasis but the metrics still show that stopping the pass is the key to having a great defense.
 

Flatlyner

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
5,348
Here's a question you might be able to answer for me....

With zone coverage becoming more and more the trend, do we want to spend hight draft pick capital on a CB, vs taking a very good OT to replace Big Rob and possibly start at LT and move AJ Jackson over to RT?? Things I openly wonder about.
Now don't get me wrong I would be happy w/ a CB in Rd 1, but Snead is so good mining CBs in mid to late picks
Finding starting OTs on day 2/3 is a lower % chance of hitting. I mean AJ Jackson was winning the lotto but that won't happen again imho

What says you???
I am just not sure that the Rams are willing to use their only premium pick on a position that, hopefully, wouldn't see the field this year. They are clearly all in and need a contributor day 1. I'm not even all that confident that they don't trade it away for a current player to help them this year, though that would have cap ramifications.
Can’t get a CB1 and RB1 via the draft with our current picks as we only have 1 first round pick and 0 2nd round picks. IMO that’s where the CB1 and RB1 picks are aligned. Trading picks (down/up) could work but would be reliant on a couple trade partners.
We can still get a RB1 in the 3rd round in this draft. That said, its not a hole we need to fill with one of our top 3 picks IMO.
 

DzRams

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
1,572
Name
Desmal M
I am just not sure that the Rams are willing to use their only premium pick on a position that, hopefully, wouldn't see the field this year. They are clearly all in and need a contributor day 1. I'm not even all that confident that they don't trade it away for a current player to help them this year, though that would have cap ramifications.

We can still get a RB1 in the 3rd round in this draft. That said, its not a hole we need to fill with one of our top 3 picks IMO.
Given Hav's age and how OL get injured, there's a decent chance an OT would see the field this year. Do you remember how bad the offense looked last year when AJ and Hav missed time?

Either one of them missing time without better back ups could be the difference between a #1 seed and barely sliding into the playoffs.
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,945
Name
Scott
Given Hav's age and how OL get injured, there's a decent chance an OT would see the field this year. Do you remember how bad the offense looked last year when AJ and Hav missed time?

Either one of them missing time without better back ups could be the difference between a #1 seed and barely sliding into the playoffs.
I can see OT with a trade back and take the kid from Minnesota, Aireontae Ersery, early in rd 2. Then maybe with three #3's you can move up with one of those and get one of the better CBs or assure you get the #2 ILB from Mississippi with a slight move to early rd 3.

The OT from the Gophers, described as a high floor guy, but may never be a dominant OT. In fact in some ways he is described by some, he sounds like a young Havs. More athletic, but just a solid RT prospect with great size. Nothing wrong with that.

 
Last edited:

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
23,780
Name
mojo
no linebacker is stopping Barkley.

If they are strong enough they aren't fast enough - if they have the speed they won't have the strength.

You have to stop Barkley at the 1st level - once he gets to the back 7 it's trouble.
Honestly with run dominant teams like Philly, Detroit, Baltimore for example…I believe the best gameplan and deterrent is a fast start on offense and get a lead. Force their QB’s to make things happen and unleash your pass rush.

Tying to crowd your front seven with run stoppers isn’t the answer.
 

Soul Surfer

Legend
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
7,033
Name
Charles Mazyck
The one thing I would point to is that if we could find a excellent run stopping linebacker that can also cover receivers and can be full-time linebacker on the field.
That would be the biggest upgrade in my opinion.
Obviously an upgrade at the corners would be huge too.