What is the best plan for the OL?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Best plan for OL

  • Status Quo: Retain Dotson and Shelton and run it back!

    Votes: 32 37.2%
  • New Guard: Let Dotson go and replace with draft pick. Retain Shelton.

    Votes: 3 3.5%
  • Center of Attention: Retain Dotson, let Shelton go, upgrade C in draft/FA.

    Votes: 48 55.8%
  • Big shift: Let Dotson go, move AJ to OG, draft a LT in Rd. 1, retain Shelton.

    Votes: 2 2.3%
  • Reset: Let Dotson and Shelton go, find replacements in FA/draft.

    Votes: 1 1.2%

  • Total voters
    86

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
30,544
"All we need to do is dump Havenstein." ~ OND
 

RamDino

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 22, 2014
Messages
2,820
Damnit… I knew someone would call me out for shoddy logic! Still doesn’t excuse bad pass blocking.
I don't think that's shoddy logic. Dotson was in the last year of his rookie contract when the Steelers replaced him and then traded him. He has had 1 good year. I don't believe he is deserving of a 15-18 million dollar multi-year deal. If he signs for that much with another team the Rams will get a nice comp pick. The other players that were mentioned were free agents that were signed to multi-year deals so that example does not count. And if his pass blocking is truly not that great, that's another reason why I would not resign him to a big deal. Lastly, this talk about signing guys but keeping their cap hits low in the early years sounds reasonable but it should not discount the fact that the big cap hits will come later. Sure, Dotson may only cost 3 or 5 million his first year but then his cap hit might balloon to 30 million after that. See Noteboom for example.
 

AvengerRam

Benevolent Troublemaker
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
5,375
I’ve seen a couple of comments using the Detroit game as a basis to condemn the pass blocking of the right side of the OL. While they did have trouble containing Hutchinson (a top pass rusher), in the end Stafford was only sacked 2 times and he passed for 367 yards and 2 TDs.

Maybe we shouldn’t be so quick to mess with something that, though not perfect, is working.
 

Allen2McVay

Legend
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
8,802
Name
Jim
"No, but you can call him a prevaricator " ~ MODS
I hate posts that make me look-up the meaning of a word.

Prevaricate ... to speak or act in an evasive way

1707398158802.png
 

OnceARam

Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
3,468
I’ve seen a couple of comments using the Detroit game as a basis to condemn the pass blocking of the right side of the OL. While they did have trouble containing Hutchinson (a top pass rusher), in the end Stafford was only sacked 2 times and he passed for 367 yards and 2 TDs.

Maybe we shouldn’t be so quick to mess with something that, though not perfect, is working.

In the Detroit game he had to rush throws, specifically the three chucks and ducks to Robinson. The two times that 350 monster hit him damn near ended him.

The bottom line is, we can do better than Dotson for the last few seasons of Stafford`s career.

Yes, I realize I am in the minority on this but at least I am loud about it. ;)
 

Ramstien

Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
2,513
Name
Ramstien
What players are available that may be considered to be an upgrade over Dotson and will cost less?
 

OnceARam

Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
3,468
What players are available that may be considered to be an upgrade over Dotson and will cost less?

Outside of the draft, I don't know. Great question though. Hopefully, someone smart will answer it.
 

RamsOfCastamere

I drink things, and know nothing
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
8,064
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to just look at the guards that were signed last year and their deals in 2023 as that's where the market is. The above seems good for looking at the historical nature of things (like looking at the Dow over 10 years) but doesn't really say much about what the market's doing year over year.

Actually, it's probably wise to look at 2022-23 as we'll get a better cross section of guards signed (good/bad/great) and it will still be recent enough to get a sense where contracts are and you'll prob have to add the markup of whatever that cap is going up (I don't have the numbers in front of me).

Sportrac estimates 16 and change average salary per year which seems high. Back of the envelop: I imagine he'd be averaging 13-14 a year but I could be underestimating how much the cap going up will cause inflation here.
I haven't figured out how to focus in like that but I don't see any new contracts that have a higher APY than the top reknown Pro Bowl guys.

Scherff's contract is fairly new (signed in 2022) and his APY is $16.5M, so my point is that Dotson may not get more than that unless a team gambles on his potential.
 

AvengerRam

Benevolent Troublemaker
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
5,375
Outside of the draft, I don't know. Great question though. Hopefully, someone smart will answer it.
It comes down to a question of probability. If we knew, with near certainty, that we could obtain another Steve Avila in Round 2 or 3, it might make sense to let Dotson go and use the money on another position. As it stands, though, Dotson is much more of a known commodity compared to any draft prospect, hence the consensus “if it ain’t broke” viewpoint.
 

Malibu

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
1,396
History would suggest they let Dotson go in free agency.
How'd did that work out for us with Corbett and especially Saffold. We historically have not spent on our OL but we have a non mobile QB who if you want to see him stay for the rest of his contract which is through 2026 you need to insulate him with a premier OL getting rid of Dotson weakens the OL and hurts the running game.

We pay Dotson hopefully a hometown discount say 60m for 4 years and upgrade the C position in the draft. I like Jackson enough to keep him can't see us using #19 on a LT with 2 bigger needs at OLB and especially CB.
 

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
6,241
I haven't figured out how to focus in like that but I don't see any new contracts that have a higher APY than the top reknown Pro Bowl guys.

Scherff's contract is fairly new (signed in 2022) and his APY is $16.5M, so my point is that Dotson may not get more than that unless a team gambles on his potential.
I agree, he won't get more than that. And that's about sportrac's estimate but seems high. Not that high but high.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,678
In the Detroit game he had to rush throws, specifically the three chucks and ducks to Robinson. The two times that 350 monster hit him damn near ended him.

The bottom line is, we can do better than Dotson for the last few seasons of Stafford`s career.

Yes, I realize I am in the minority on this but at least I am loud about it. ;)
Detroit had the top pressure % per snap in the league last year. Their defense had a lot of issues but they stopped the run well and got after the QB as well as anyone. Hutch is a beast.

I think you are underestimating how well the OL played in that game. What the Rams need to do is at least attempt to return this OL intact for 2024 while adding to the defense. Because even though I admit there is risk in signing Dotson, there is also a big difference in his play vs a guy like Corbs who we let walk. We knew Corbs wasn't all that talented and it showed in Carolina. But Dotson eliminates physical interior DL in pass pro. There's a difference in level of player here.

Now whether Dotson puts his feet up the moment he's paid is another conversation. So if the Rams let him walk it means they don't trust him to not do that. But he's in that range of quality of the type of player you want to retain if possible.
 

RamsOfCastamere

I drink things, and know nothing
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
8,064
Detroit had the top pressure % per snap in the league last year. Their defense had a lot of issues but they stopped the run well and got after the QB as well as anyone. Hutch is a beast.

I think you are underestimating how well the OL played in that game. What the Rams need to do is at least attempt to return this OL intact for 2024 while adding to the defense. Because even though I admit there is risk in signing Dotson, there is also a big difference in his play vs a guy like Corbs who we let walk. We knew Corbs wasn't all that talented and it showed in Carolina. But Dotson eliminates physical interior DL in pass pro. There's a difference in level of player here.

Now whether Dotson puts his feet up the moment he's paid is another conversation. So if the Rams let him walk it means they don't trust him to not do that. But he's in that range of quality of the type of player you want to retain if possible.
And a bigger difference between him and Anchrum/Bruss/McClendon/whoever else is waiting behind him.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,035
I haven't figured out how to focus in like that but I don't see any new contracts that have a higher APY than the top reknown Pro Bowl guys.

Scherff's contract is fairly new (signed in 2022) and his APY is $16.5M, so my point is that Dotson may not get more than that unless a team gambles on his potential.
Scherff is an interesting comp, but it supports a pretty hefty contract for Dotson.
Just on value alone, 3 years 49.5 mill in 2022 equates to a significantly higher number today. He signed that deal when the cap was roughly 208 mill, and now it is to exceed 240 mill. That's a 15% increase.
Even at a modest 3-5% annual increase, that would put Sherff closer to 18 mill per