Trade Up Discussion

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,041
Kind of ironic that some suggest the Rams wont want to used draft capital for a single player when the mantra of the team has been "Eff them picks". Sure they have primarily invested draft picks on proven veteran players, but still. I think if there is a player who they want, they'll do whatever means necessary to go and get him.
Not saying they will, but it wouldnt surprise me if they did
 

Neil039

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 3, 2020
Messages
4,048
Kind of ironic that some suggest the Rams wont want to used draft capital for a single player when the mantra of the team has been "Eff them picks". Sure they have primarily invested draft picks on proven veteran players, but still. I think if there is a player who they want, they'll do whatever means necessary to go and get him.
Not saying they will, but it wouldnt surprise me if they did
That’s the rip of Snead’s tenure as GM. You can’t be surprised by the surprise.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,683
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #63
Yeah probably 99.99% chance of a trade down. But Les loves to zig when we expect him to zag.
 

Flatlyner

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Survivor Champion
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
4,669
I wrote earlier in the month about trading up for OCyrus Torrence I am amending that. I do not see a need to trade up and lose any draft capital I want him and he maybe at #36, but if he goes earlier I say wait there absolutely be a great player most likely an OLB.

I honestly don't see a name that is worth trading up for. Conversely I do not want us trading down ONLY if it is 5-7 picks and there are at least 2 to 3 players we would love to have. No trade down and hope your player is there like we stupidly did in 2012 when we were set to take Bobby Wagner instead we netted a bust at RB and the extra 5th rounder was a bust at G. Same with the trade down 3 times netting us Rapp a ton of good players could have been had between #31 to 61.
Yeah, I have a hard time believing that the Rams would trade up for a OG anyways. Based on recent mocks and feel, Torrence may fall to the 2nd now anyway. 3 OL have been gaining steam recently by most accounts: Avila, Tippmann, Bergeron. They may push Torrence down even further. I've kind of started to lean Avila if we are going OL with our first pick. He's far more versatile and can play any position on the line, including center.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,683
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #66
I prefer Schmitz but would welcome any investment they make up front. Expecting late round additions but would love to be wrong.
 

Neil039

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 3, 2020
Messages
4,048
I prefer Schmitz but would welcome any investment they make up front. Expecting late round additions but would love to be wrong.
Missing out on an anchor for the line has been a thorn in the Rams side since the 2021 draft.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,041
Captain Obvious point here but I suppose how much they believe in Logan Bruss will play a huge factor. We really have no idea
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,683
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #70
Same with Anchrum. He went down right after getting the starting nod.
That shit is so irritating. Nothing I find more annoying than seeing a depth piece that can't go the moment he's needed. Granted that can just be bad luck. But we've dealt with so much of that shit at RB that I am over it. If a guy can't do that job of being available as a depth piece you need new depth pieces.
 

Allen2McVay

Legend
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
8,803
Name
Jim
Captain Obvious point here but I suppose how much they believe in Logan Bruss will play a huge factor. We really have no idea
tenor.gif
 

Flatlyner

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Survivor Champion
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
4,669
Thowing any of our delicate OLine doesn't seem wise.
 

Malibu

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
1,396
Captain Obvious point here but I suppose how much they believe in Logan Bruss will play a huge factor. We really have no idea
Whether they believe in him or not we still need a LG. Technically speaking Torrence was basically a RG.
 

LARAMSinFeb.

Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
4,682
Yeah, I have a hard time believing that the Rams would trade up for a OG anyways. Based on recent mocks and feel, Torrence may fall to the 2nd now anyway. 3 OL have been gaining steam recently by most accounts: Avila, Tippmann, Bergeron. They may push Torrence down even further. I've kind of started to lean Avila if we are going OL with our first pick. He's far more versatile and can play any position on the line, including center.
I think we’ve sought versatility for too long. It’s time for a beast who will—instead of getting bullied—will be the bully, one that D lines will have to contend with, and that’s Torrence.
 

Flatlyner

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Survivor Champion
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
4,669
I think we’ve sought versatility for too long. It’s time for a beast who will—instead of getting bullied—will be the bully, one that D lines will have to contend with, and that’s Torrence.
I think you may be underestimating Avila (if you are suggesting he cannot be an interior bully). Dude is a massive powerhouse, 6'3 332. Versatility doesn't discount him having power. Also, we could use a Center, so Avila makes some sense there as well, since he played mostly center at TCU.
 

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
6,241
I love Kraft. He's not in LaPorta's class in terms of his polish in the pattern. But long term he may end up being one of the best TEs from this class. He is physical, real throwback type TE. He just played at a lower level of competition so yeah he's also being slept on I believe.

Kraft at 69 would be fantastic.

Ooooomfph, I really don't see him dropping to there: I think two things will be true about this draft. Teams won't feel much pressure to take them in the 1st knowing it's a deep class and more important positions are to be had (Kincaid and Mayer prob go in 1st though) and that they're will be a run on TE's in the 2nd - but will it be at the top of the 2nd, middle or bottom? In either case, Musgrave and Kraft will be gone by then, Washington and LaPorta might still be around with the Schoonmaker as a 3rd round consolation prize.
 

PARAM

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
4,361
Missing out on an anchor for the line has been a thorn in the Rams side since the 2021 draft.
It's been a thorn in Rams fans sides, for sure. I just feel the way things went last year, we could have had Creed Humphrey, Taylor Lewan and Trent Williams and somehow, they would have missed a ton of time!!
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,683
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #79
One annoyance I have every year is the top TE options seem to get taken before we pick in round 2. Now we're sitting near the top of round 2 in an epic TE draft but have enormous needs at Edge & Corner that trump it.

It would figure that I have to watch both LaPorta and Kraft, maybe even some others, go off the board after our pick at 36 and before 69. Or worse they're on the board at 69 and 77 and the Rams opt other directions. :laugh3:
 

LARAMSinFeb.

Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
4,682
I think you may be underestimating Avila (if you are suggesting he cannot be an interior bully). Dude is a massive powerhouse, 6'3 332. Versatility doesn't discount him having power. Also, we could use a Center, so Avila makes some sense there as well, since he played mostly center at TCU.

Good to hear. They're 1-2 according to this (random) site. Torrence is bigger, and is known for run blocking (which I think is what Stafford needs the most) though.