I looked at the entire schedule. Early on, they weren't running well and we could understand that with a new O line gelling. 3.2, 3.5, 3.2, 5.3 (a good avg in a loss), 4.1 (still good), 3.9 and then 2.5. Inconsistent to say the least. However, over the next 8 games, they were very good (all 4.2 or better except 1 game and 3 games over 5.0) and that brings us to Baltimore, SF and the postseason. 6 games in total where their best average was 3.7. To me, that's not successful running, though with this offense, just the threat can be enough. So was I totally disappointed in the run game? Absolutely not. But I was curious why, after a slow start we had an 8 game stretch where we were running real well, then dropped off the final two games and in the postseason. Tougher games? I can buy that. I'd still like Michel to resign or draft that Bama kid.