Yup. I was thinking the same thing. Luck looks a lot like Favre. He's more of a gunslinger than I thought he would be.
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Yup. I was thinking the same thing. Luck looks a lot like Favre. He's more of a gunslinger than I thought he would be.
I know the pitfalls of going down this path of hypotheticals but in addition to what you're saying, he had 3 TD's taken away by penalty or drop too. 17 TD/0 INT to start the season would have been pretty sweet if only things had bounced differently. And that was with the bad games against SF and DAL. If the Rams had started the year with Stacy and gone with what actually worked from the beginning, this season would have gone a lot differently. I don't know if there's any way they could have made that choice any earlier but I blame part of the delay in how they approached preseason. It would have been nice if they'd tried some of the actual game plays to see if they were going to be effective.
Oh well, I'm just looking forward to next year. 2012 wasn't fool's gold and the team is approaching that mythical corner, hopefully to turn it soon after.
mr.stlouis
Legend
Yes, but that's one of the worste divisions in football too.
Only weaker division I can think of off hand was the NFCE. That division STINKS!!!
I'll say right now...that I think this thread isn't going to lead anywhere productive.
To be fair, I think he should be charged with 2. He had at least 1 dropped int against SF and I'll give him some blame for the Arizona INT.
To be fair, I think he should be charged with 2. He had at least 1 dropped int against SF and I'll give him some blame for the Arizona INT.
Regardless of how the hypothetical numbers could have played out, Bradford was off to a really good start and that was while the team and coaches hadn't figured things out yet. We'd all hoped 2013 would be when it all came together and that Bradford finally being in a system for more than 1 year would pay the dividends overall. Well, I think they paid in terms of Bradford as he was playing at a new level. Maybe not elite but all those little things that so many had questions about were improved. Pocket awareness, deep ball, looking off defenders, whatever. Bradford looked much more polished this year.
The rest of the offense just needed time to catch up. Richardson was a bad call, Austin wasn't acclimated, Quick still hasn't figured it out, the line hadn't gelled...but 2014 won't see the Rams with so many of those problems. There will always be some of them of course but I feel really confident that so many things are going to come together for the offense next year. I was hopeful coming into this year but I'm actually pretty confident about next year. My faith in this front office, scouting department and coaching staff is pretty high and I'm pretty excited about Bradford, Stacy, Bailey, Austin and the o-line under Boudreau. It's been a long time coming but I think this team is coming out of the tunnel.
Productive how? Like we'd solve world hunger with our astute observation skills? lol.
I think 2 sounds about right as well. And you can absolutely add a couple of TDs to his total were it not for the drops and penalties. But I suppose that's the case with all QBs in the league during the course of the season. Add here, subtract there. The bottom line is, we finished right where we finished last year, and there was a LOT more adversity this year. That hump is hard to get over, but once you do....
eek:
I have concerns about your decision making too.
Which, subsequently, could affect your durability when I'm done with ya.
*See I can say that now that I'm not an admin.
I think.
