That is probably not what it is supposed to be, but invariably that is more or less how it turns out.Is that what it's supposed to be?
A lot of words and stats but couldnt understand the point
That is probably not what it is supposed to be, but invariably that is more or less how it turns out.Is that what it's supposed to be?
A lot of words and stats but couldnt understand the point
Thanks, my bad. When I added the numbers, I misread the rows and left out the 2021 season for Stafford. That's why the numbers didn't match.goff as a ram: 5 4th quarter comebacks. 8 winning drivrs
Stafford as a ram 9 4th quarter comebacks. 13 winning drives
From pro ref
All I did was try to present the stats themselves.But you misinterpret some of them.
....
Not really. Interpretation of the numbers is what's important, not the numbers themselves. So no hornets nest here. Stafford is by far, the better QB of the two.
I don't dispute this but remember that in the context of the trade, the teams didn't swap the QBs head-to-head. The Rams sent multiple 1st round picks to Detroit and since the Rams unexpectedly had a down year, one of those picks ended up being in the top 10 overall. If the Rams had traded down the same way Detroit did, we would have added another 2nd round pick and still could have gotten a great player lower in the 1st.2. Ask any Rams fan which QB they'd rather have over the last five years. Still a slam dunk.
But a more postive impact on the most important and valued position...that being the QB, as well in the subsequent years. Guys like Darnold are the exception for Super Bowl winners, not the norm.The trade helped us win the SB that 1st season with Stafford but losing those picks had a negative impact on subsequent years (including the current season) as we try to chase another trophy.
I know I'm going to stir up a hornet's nest with this one, but I happened to look at some numbers that really surprised me. During the Panthers and Lions game, they mentioned that Goff has played longer for Detroit than he did as a Ram, which made me curious to look at his stats.
If we compare Stafford's stats as a Ram to Goff's stats as a Lion, Stafford leads in one category, and it is the most important one: Super Bowl wins. I guess you could add MVP awards if you want to consider that to be a stat.
For their regular season stats, Goff is ahead of Stafford in almost every other meaningful statistic. A virtual clean sweep. Wins, completion rate, QB passer rating, TD/INT ratio, 4th quarter comebacks, game winning drives, PFR has a key stat called adjusted net yards per attempt. One reason this is surprising is that Stafford won the SB his first year with the Rams. Meanwhile, the Lions were terrible the 1st year Goff was there, they couldn't buy a win for the longest time. At one point that year the Lions had zero wins, 10 losses and a tie. I got the stats from PFR.
Stafford: 78 starts, 48-30-0 record. 1,763/2,701 (65.3% completions), 20,596 yards, 147 TDs (5.4%), 58 INTs (2.1%), 2.53 TD/INT ratio, 7.6 yards per attempt, 7.7 adjusted yards per attempt, 264.1 YPG, 97.4 QB rating, 7.0 ANY/A, 146 sacks (5.13%), 6 4th quarter comebacks, 8 game winning drives
Goff: 86 starts, 50-35-1 record. 2,013/2964 (67.9% completions), 22,665 yards, 158 TDs (5.3%), 47 INTs (1.6%), 3.36 TD/INT ratio, 7.6 yards per attempt, 8.0 adjusted yards per attempt, 263.5 YPG, 101.7 QB rating, 7.2 ANY/A, 165 sacks (5.27%), 12 4th quarter comebacks, 17 game winning drives
The Lions are struggling and their window to contend might have closed. Meanwhile, the Rams have hopes for capturing a 2nd SB with Stafford. There are no regrets from the Rams side of the trade. On the other hand, if I got in a time machine and went back to when the trade was made and told you that the stats would look like this, what percentage of Rams fans would have believed me? I bet the majority would have assumed that Goff would no longer be Detroit's starter and might not even still be in the NFL by this point.
You seem to accept certain things as fact when they aren't.All I did was try to present the stats themselves.
Look at the trade from Detroit's POV. Stafford demanded to be traded. He saw a rebuild coming and he didn't want to waste the rest of his career in that situation. Typically, if a older QB makes a public demand like that, the team doesn't have leverage and has to trade him for less value. Detroit was not in a good negotiating position.
Surprisingly, Detroit end up getting a long-term starting QB, plus a nice haul of high draft picks. If you look around the NFL, consider the success rate of 1st round QBs since the trade (e.g. Justin Fields, Mac Jones, Trey Lance, Anthony Richardson, Zach Wilson, Kenny Pickett, JJ McCarthy, even Cam Ward at number one overall) what the Lions got with the "throw in" Goff ended up being more valuable than a high 1st round selection. Consider as an example CJ Stroud, a QB who when he was in the draft was frequently compared to Goff. If you gave Detroit the choice, would they trade Goff right now for Stroud? My gut says they would stick with Goff. Stroud was the 2nd overall selection in his draft class.
When people say that the trade worked well for both teams, this is a massive understatement. The Rams got at least one SB after the trade, while for Detroit, IMO the trade could have been the best single transaction for the team since the day they drafted Barry Sanders. Oddly, it is arguably even more significant than when they drafted Stafford, because they only got one player with that pick, and in the trade they effectively got multiple players.
Instead of Detroit going into a "dark ages" period like the Rams experienced before McVay's revival, they rebounded quickly and almost made it to the SB themselves. In my lifetime, I have never seen Detroit's fan base so energized as they have been in the last few years. For an entire generation, including some painful experiences when Stafford was up there, it was "cruel and unusual punishment" to be a Lions fan. There has been a sea change. I hope something like that happens someday for Cleveland Browns fans.
On the first highlighted part, WTF are you talking about.The trade helped us win the SB that 1st season with Stafford but losing those picks had a negative impact on subsequent years (including the current season) as we try to chase another trophy. Stafford is a much better QB than Sam Darnold. Seattle still won the SB with Darnold. They had a more complete team last season than the Rams. Does the difference between Stafford and Goff make up for that gap? [We also have to consider the salary cap, because the trade had negative cap consequences for both the Rams and the Lions.] We could debate that until the cows come home.
Fisher was a QB career killer. In fact, Fisher ruined many offensive players careers..
I didn't know where else to put this.
After watching the vince young doco it confirmed everything i thought about Jeff fisher. He didn't want Goff and it showed as he did everything in his power to derail the rookie QB's career.
Goff should thank everything that is good and holy in the world that Sean McVay entered his life before fisher ruined his career for good.
.
Perhaps.I would agree with you on this, but for me It's Goff's lack of ability to sense or judge the under-siege throwing pocket that will deny him the ring.
Yep. You’re right. I saw it again yesterday. Pretty much the same sentiment.I believe he said losers.
I think Darnold can play that game manager QB position better than Goff - though Goff has better tools. I’m just not convinced Goff ever wins a SB and I actually liked Goff. Even if Goff has a stellar O-line, receiving corp, and running game, he does just enough dumb shit in the biggest games.Stafford is a much better QB than Sam Darnold. Seattle still won the SB with Darnold. They had a more complete team last season than the Rams. Does the difference between Stafford and Goff make up for that gap?
Yes, #9 has not handled it well lately....I'd look at the right side of the OL as the main reason for that...Kevin Dotson & Warren McClendon have forgotten how to pass block!Perhaps.
Although, Stafford has regressed pretty badly when under pressure this season. Ranking, I believe, worst among starting QBs.
A lot more goes into that than just a number however.
I don't think he was a completely incompetent HC other than he was fucking stubborn at getting a good OC.Fisher was a QB career killer. In fact, Fisher ruined many offensive players careers.
He got lucky in TN but was ultimately exposed for the incompetent HC he really was.