no, I meant having a headache is one penalty but having username punch you in the dick is offsetting...That's the moral?
Uh, duh!
And @Username the hell away from me! He's supposed to be stalking Bellichick.
Never mind. I'm taking a nap.
no, I meant having a headache is one penalty but having username punch you in the dick is offsetting...That's the moral?
Uh, duh!
And @Username the hell away from me! He's supposed to be stalking Bellichick.
Doesn't that mean the Shehags should have won since they lead the league in penalties and had the most penalties in the game?![]()
That there is @MrMotes .
I don't expect you to agree Mr. Motes I expect you to...
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1TmeBd9338
I dunno... he's being pretty obstinate...You expect him to die?
That's a little harsh, don'tcha think? :eek:
Fear for his nads Mr. -X-. Kind of like getting punched in the dick by @Username no ?-X- with this:
You expect him to die?
That's a little harsh, don'tcha think? :eek:
Nobody said they don't matter (that I know of). It's just that when you have teams winning Super bowls who lead the league in penalties, and teams with horrible records who are the best at avoiding them, it kind of solidifies the idea that there's no correlation between penalties and success (or lack thereof).
You just need good players and a good plan. Everything else will take care of itself.
No... or... maybe.... we just don't know... there is no correlation.So, commit more penalties?
Why would he have to take anything away?So what portion of practice does Fisher take away from in order to make the team more cognizant about not committing penalties?
Or lead the league in fewest penalties ... like the Jaguars and their boss 3-13 record.So, commit more penalties?
Why would he have to take anything away?
It's called coaching.
False starts, for example... I'd guess you can practice that pretty easily while you are coaching blocking skills?
Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one.You'd guess wrong.
The reason why most guys get false start penalties is that they're trying to have a quicker first step than their opponent off the snap. Coaches work on getting the first step down from the first day of practice. It's the first thing linemen do in unit drills. It's pretty much the bedrock of the entire exercise.
So yeah, you would be taking something away. You're always taking something away if you want guys to do something differently, that's just reality and time management in practice.
It's not like Martz wouldn't have loved a team that didn't turn the ball over, if he could have a perfect team. But there's no such monster. You have to make choices. His choice was to have an aggressive offense. Fisher is to have a physical, explosive team. Guess what has to go sometimes when you do that?
It's probably a pretty high priority for him, but ultimately there's nothing he can do if they happen. I mean, if Carroll, Bellyfat, and Pagano can't get their players to stop committing penalties (1, 2 and 3 last year), then why should Fisher be held more accountable?I think the realistic answer is probably gonna be, "he's not gonna." Right, wrong, or indifferent, that's just not going to be a priority for him.
Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one.
As I said, when the Rams get to the super bowl (or even playoffs), I'll stop being concerned about penalties.
Until then, I don't care what Jeff Fisher has to give up... what he has been doing isn't working particularly well.
Now that I think about it, maybe he should give something up....![]()
It's probably a pretty high priority for him, but ultimately there's nothing he can do if they happen. I mean, if Bellyfat, Carroll and Pagano can't get their players to stop committing penalties (1, 2 and 3 last year), then why should Fisher be held more accountable?
The choices become easier when you have the best players!
Or lead the league in fewest penalties ... like the Jaguars and their boss 3-13 record.