(So sad): All indications' Rams will pass on Watkins

  • Thread starter Thread starter RFIP
  • Start date Start date
  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
iced said:
The problems with the Lions is their defense, not the offense.
Click to expand...
I know that. That's why I said he's not a determining factor in the team's success.
iced said:
I see us as a one dimensional offense right now - and we need playmakers on the outside. Can't be one dimensional against these teams in the division - not with their front 7's. they're all stout against the run.
Click to expand...
But you just said (and I reiterated) the Seahawks were one dimensional with their porous pass blocking. And yet....
 
-X- said:
I know that. That's why I said he's not a determining factor in the team's success.

But you just said (and I reiterated) the Seahawks were one dimensional with their porous pass blocking. And yet....
Click to expand...

didn't say they were one dimensional - marshawn is one hell of a back and that defense is the best in the league.

they still moved the chains a bit through the air....

plus you have the wilson effect, scrambling and getting yards or extra time
 
iced said:
didn't say they were one dimensional - marshawn is one hell of a back and that defense is the best in the league.

they still moved the chains a bit through the air....
Click to expand...
One-dimensional as it applies to the offense.
But, we're getting into semantics now. I think we both made our points known. (y)
 
CGI_Ram said:
I wonder what those "indications", are?

And... why would they tip their hand?

Personally; I think JT is posting what an outsider would conclude based on looking at the team. I believe what he's posted, because it makes sense. But, doubt that's came from any inside sources.
Click to expand...
This is all coming from a radio interview he did early last week. He is drawing this conclusion based on the comments Snead and Fisher both made early in the year regarding our receivers developing.

This is not anything that has come from new information...take this (and ANY draft info you hear) with a grain of salt. I mean, the made these comments about not needing to add any receivers and then they went out and signed Kenny Britt.
 
There's enough talent on this team at rec. a good QB will flourish ,if Sam can't get it done with these folks ,he can't get it done
 
  • Like
Reactions: LesBaker and rhinobean
Thordaddy said:
There's enough talent on this team at rec. a good QB will flourish ,if Sam can't get it done with these folks ,he can't get it done
Click to expand...

If this team has enough talent at receiver then I don't see any team drafting a receiver, which is good news as Watkins should be available as an UDFA :party:.
 
Rams and Gators said:
If this team has enough talent at receiver then I don't see any team drafting a receiver, which is good news as Watkins should be available as an UDFA :party:.
Click to expand...
That post needed at least double blue font. Perhaps triple.

No, I'm not sure how that would be possible.
 
Thordaddy said:
There's enough talent on this team at rec. a good QB will flourish ,if Sam can't get it done with these folks ,he can't get it done
Click to expand...

i severely disagree - i think it's the opposite.

Name one player who has left here and actually played better elsewhere?

Upgrade the receiver position and you'll see the impact reflected on Bradford. I'm sure he'd love to have a target that gets open quicker (or at all)
 
Rams and Gators said:
If this team has enough talent at receiver then I don't see any team drafting a receiver, which is good news as Watkins should be available as an UDFA :party:.
Click to expand...
Hyperbolic much?
I believe we end up with two A.M. players from this draft and no Watkins,it'll be Evans if he's there when we want him which won't be at 2 and the main reason it would be him is his ability to block guys like Sherman,that's the only place I see us needing to upgrade at rec.
 
Thordaddy said:
Hyperbolic much?
I believe we end up with two A.M. players from this draft and no Watkins,it'll be Evans if he's there when we want him which won't be at 2 and the main reason it would be him is his ability to block guys like Sherman,that's the only place I see us needing to upgrade at rec.
Click to expand...

That and catching the ball, but that's only a minor one.
 
And unblued sarcasm as well, multi talented y'are

Watkins will be good,I take that as a given ,but the "we have nothing at rec." rhetoric is tired and wrong and I can't wait to see it exposed. Sam has to make it with this bunch and maybe Evans or IMO he's the guy who takes the fall/ blame.He was headed for a career year with three newbies at rec. on this team last year ,that IMO only gets better even without Evans this year time for a franchise tackle.
 
iced said:
i severely disagree - i think it's the opposite.

Name one player who has left here and actually played better elsewhere?

Upgrade the receiver position and you'll see the impact reflected on Bradford. I'm sure he'd love to have a target that gets open quicker (or at all)
Click to expand...


go re watch games after stacy took over. the receivers were getting open. Either Clemens didnt see them didnt have time or wasnt accurate. ive been watching the games like a coupleweeks. So i disagree
 
iced said:
i severely disagree - i think it's the opposite.

Name one player who has left here and actually played better elsewhere?

Upgrade the receiver position and you'll see the impact reflected on Bradford. I'm sure he'd love to have a target that gets open quicker (or at all)
Click to expand...
Laurant Robinson
 
lockdnram21 said:
go re watch games after stacy took over. the receivers were getting open. Either Clemens didnt see them didnt have time or wasnt accurate. ive been watching the games like a coupleweeks. So i disagree
Click to expand...
I have - and I disagree.

Thordaddy said:
Laurant Robinson
Click to expand...
okay true - but then he was the #3/4 option behind dez bryant,jason witten, and miles austin.

But Robinson is also a free agent and was cut by jacksonville of all teams last year..

so I kinda go back to my main point - the guys not even playing anymore
 
iced said:
I have - and I disagree.


okay true - but then he was the #3/4 option behind dez bryant,jason witten, and miles austin.

But Robinson is also a free agent and was cut by jacksonville of all teams last year..

so I kinda go back to my main point - the guys not even playing anymore
Click to expand...
He got hurt and FWIW everyone and his uncle HERE laughed at the Cowboys for signing him .
 
Thordaddy said:
He got hurt and FWIW everyone and his uncle HERE laughed at the Cowboys for signing him .
Click to expand...
Actually, I thought it was a smart, value signing for the Cowboys. I laughed at the Jaguars, however, for signing him to a big money contract and expecting him to be a no.1 WR.
 
jjab360 said:
Actually, I thought it was a smart, value signing for the Cowboys. I laughed at the Jaguars, however, for signing him to a big money contract and expecting him to be a no.1 WR.
Click to expand...
So that makes you nobody
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back