- Joined
- Jun 4, 2013
- Messages
- 9,029
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #201
Problem with that statement is this,you really think what YOU SAW in training camp is not only superior to OUR opinion but Fishers as well,you REALLY? think what you saw is more relevant than what the coaches have seen since closing practices, in meetings, film sessions?
And what's this "reasonable " crap, you don't understand that's a direct shot at those who disagree with you implying they are unreasonable for disagreeing with you?
Yes it IS in Fishers hands and if ya don't mind me saying so,I value his opinion above yours, not just because of his experience ,but his job depends on these decisions ,he has more to lose .
"Play the game for more than you can afford to lose... only then will you learn the game."
Winston Churchill
No @Thordaddy, no. What I'm saying is the attacks on Hill are mostly made up and what we saw wasn't. CoachO and I SAW AD suck in TC. We SAW Hill play much better than AD. Those are FACTS.
Did Hill suck in game one? Hell no. He was driving the team every series and was screwed by penalties. Did he look like a deer in the headlights? Hell no! Hill took ONE SACK. Davis took FOUR. That reaffirms my belief from what I already SAW with my own eyes, Hill is better at avoiding sacks. But people want to somehow state that AD is going to avoid sacks better because he's younger?! It makes no sense and in a debate about who should start, I'm GOING TO POINT OUT things that make no sense.
Did you value Fishers opinion more when I was calling for AD last season?! Is it POSSIBLE Fisher made a bad decision then that cost us games and is again?
Really though, stop clicking on discussions titled Suan Hill and getting all worked up because we believe Hill may be better... THAT'S what the discussion is ABOUT!