The only thing I want from Bradford is for him to play half of his team's snaps to save us a draft pick.Other than that he can kick rocks he didn't want to be here after our Rams made him rich and stood by him he can go to hell greedy bastard.
Simple. He is no longer a Ram so he is no longer subjected to the Rams curse.How did he get up from that but when the browns player just touched him his knee snapped in half?
.
Honestly I'm kinda rooting for the Eagles this year and it's all because of Sam. I hope he stays healthy and has a successful career.I'd be lying if I wasn't excited.
He didn't have a good game that's for sure. Bullet throws that his receivers can't handle and overthrown balls. Without the 27 penalties called against Suggs they (the Smeagols) don't score with him in there. Probably.jjab360 wondering when SB will learn how to spell change up:
I... wasn't impressed.
Honestly, what I saw reminded me of a lot of the things that Foles has that I always wished Sammy would get better at like pocket presence, touch passes, aggressiveness, and positive body language.
The Eagles and Ravens got to know each other during three joint practice sessions in Philadelphia this week. Apparently, Sam Bradford and his teammates learned enough to determine that some of Baltimore's players didn't have the best of intentions.
The situation came to a head on Saturday when Ravens outside linebacker Terrell Suggs was flagged for a low hit on Bradford during a read-option play.
Bradford, who has had two consecutive torn ACL surgeries, did not appreciate it. Neither did Eaglesleft tackle Jason Peters.
Suggs was asked to respond and defended himself, saying the Eagles should not run the read-option offense if they're worried about a quarterback taking hits.
"When you run the read option, you have to know the rules," Suggs said, via The Baltimore Sun. "If you want to run the read option with your starting quarterback that's had two knee surgeries, that's on you. That's not my responsibility to update you on the rule."
This is an issue that won't go away. During an offseason trending with joint practice sessions -- and high-profile fights -- this is a fallout that neither coach could have predicted. It might also put an end to the rapidly expanding idea that joint practices add a certain value for teams looking to mix up a typically mundane period on their schedule.
This is also not a talking point that will die soon. Regardless of Suggs' intentions, his actions will be looked at under a microscope this week.
Jurry is still out on Kelly in my eyes. His offense works great agsinst mediocre to bad defenses or in preseason games where teams are not gane planning for the huury up read option stuff like last night. However, against talented defenses, thus far it has not worked.
His record against winning teams is horrible, they have beaten few over his 1st two years, the Rams have won more games against good teams. Top defenses that don't need to sub players, handle that offense. Look what Seattle, the Cards, even the Niners did to them last year. The Packers destroyed them to and their d is just above average.
So I think they have a lot to prove. The thing is though they have an extremely weak schedule, so they should be a lock for 10, 11 wins no matter who plays QB, but come playoffs, can they out scheme a good defense?
BTW. Notice that the same offense in college gets similar results? Oregon runs it up on avg teams, but physical defenses handle them, like Stanford normally does or their losses in title games to Auburn, when Kelly was there and again this past season.