HometownBoy
Hall of Fame
To be fair, at least Nick Foles had a last year. It was kind of subpar, but it was a last year. That's less than can be said for Bradford, who would literally only be getting paid for preseason looks.
To be fair, at least Nick Foles had a last year. It was kind of subpar, but it was a last year. That's less than can be said for Bradford, who would literally only be getting paid for preseason looks.
That's all u see on this damn site Bradford Bradford Bradford. I thought this was a rams site
It does get a bit tiring to see everyone constantly fawning over him as if he actually did anything here
Sheesh, be a little more dramatic. Where is this fawning you see, because I've been in multiples of these threads and it always goes the same way.It does get a bit tiring to see everyone constantly fawning over him as if he actually did anything here, but hey ho, were going to see Bradford threads after every single completion he makes for the rest of his life, best to embrace it, or not to click on the threads. That is unless the mods can come up with a way to give you an option to block threads if they contain a keyword.
To be fair, at least Nick Foles had a last year. It was kind of subpar, but it was a last year. That's less than can be said for Bradford, who would literally only be getting paid for preseason looks.
You know that I'm just f'ing with you I hope.I should have mentioned the injury thing since I meant the obvious, as everyone knows his health........ good catch.
Where is this "constant fawning" you speak of? Some examples please?
Full disclosure: I was glad when he was traded because I didn't want to go through one more season of watching him hold a clipboard on the sideline while the team toiled away with yet one more backup QB.
That said, any news on Sam Bradford this season will be of interest to most here and we will post it for that reason. If someone is tired of it they can avoid clicking on the thread.
You know that I'm just f'ing with you I hope.
Yeah I know, the whole they sucked without Foles part.The Iggles were still 6-2.
So I'd take that subpar everyday of the week.
Yeah I know, the whole they sucked without Foles part.
Still, that doesn't change that his completion rating was in the toilet and a TD to int ratio of 1.3. I don't expect Foles to be 2013 good, but his 2014 isn't going to be acceptable either. Not when our team doesn't have a McCoy(yet.) or Maclin to bail us out.
Where is this "constant fawning" you speak of? Some examples please?
Full disclosure: I was glad when he was traded because I didn't want to go through one more season of watching him hold a clipboard on the sideline while the team toiled away with yet one more backup QB.
That said, any news on Sam Bradford this season will be of interest to most here and we will post it for that reason. If someone is tired of it they can avoid clicking on the thread.
or not to click on the threads
How about first you get off the fawning over BS and then use your own advice of not clicking on threads that contain the words Sam Bradford yourself if it is so tiring. Seriously, saying that everyone is fawning over him or that there is some constant barrage of Bradford threads is garbage.It does get a bit tiring to see everyone constantly fawning over him as if he actually did anything here, but hey ho, were going to see Bradford threads after every single completion he makes for the rest of his life, best to embrace it, or not to click on the threads. That is unless the mods can come up with a way to give you an option to block threads if they contain a keyword.
And yet - here you are.There's been 12 Bradford threads since the start of July (or at least threads with "Bradford" in the title, there's a few which spring to mind which I can't find through the search engine), 90% of posts fall into the fawning over category for me. I'm not going to call posters out by name, because that's petty BS I'm not interested in getting involved in.
Honestly it's like Kardashian news for me, I don't need to know that one of them has just taken a dump, just like I don't need to know every detail of Sam Bradford's life, but it's easily avoidable, and it seems a lot of people are interested in it, so there must be something to it.
As I said in my original post
Question, is fawning as basic as not saying you hate him or as simple as wishing him well and not disliking him?There's been 12 Bradford threads since the start of July (or at least threads with "Bradford" in the title, there's a few which spring to mind which I can't find through the search engine), 90% of posts fall into the fawning over category for me. I'm not going to call posters out by name, because that's petty BS I'm not interested in getting involved in.
Honestly it's like Kardashian news for me, I don't need to know that one of them has just taken a dump, just like I don't need to know every detail of Sam Bradford's life, but it's easily avoidable, and it seems a lot of people are interested in it, so there must be something to it.
As I said in my original post
He's, so damn dreamy :mustache: