-X-
Medium-sized Lebowski
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2010
- Messages
- 35,576
- Name
- The Dude
Are they in L.A.?you know that the team he owns are called the gunners, don't you?
.
Are they in L.A.?you know that the team he owns are called the gunners, don't you?
.
Are they in L.A.?
You're missing my point. With the gun violence problem in California (Country-wide, really), it would be ill advised to call a team "The Gunners." Such a team name would elicit at least some form of protest.no but seeing this rumour came from england and his team is called the arsenal gunners it makes perfect sense to them that his supposed la team will also be called the gunners.
.
why would anyone else comment on it? anyone from Kroenkes group would be pretty scared to get caught talking about something Stan wont talk about himself.Who said it was Kroenke that was talking to the UK press?
why would anyone else comment on it? anyone from Kroenkes group would be pretty scared to get caught talking about something Stan wont talk about himself.
You're missing my point. With the gun violence problem in California (Country-wide, really), it would be ill advised to call a team "The Gunners." Such a team name would elicit at least some form of protest.
I just don't see it, could be wrong, I was once 8 years ago, lol.It happens all the time, especially when it fits what they want. Having info like this out there will only help Kroenke with regards to leverage against the CVC.
Can you say Washington Bullets?You're missing my point. With the gun violence problem in California (Country-wide, really), it would be ill advised to call a team "The Gunners." Such a team name would elicit at least some form of protest.
Well that settles it. The SUN has an anonymous tipster. Who can argue against THAT iron clad evidence? I'm buying my LA Rams jersey tomorrow. Oh wait. I already have some. Score! I have one question though. If this source is that good, why hasn't the National Inquirer picked it up? Maybe it was an anonymous hipster.
Yeah. I'm pretty sure that if real grass will grow in London, it will grow in LA. Just a guess. But I have to wonder if FLV is talking more about the abuse delivered to an NFL field. I still think that with all the advances, you could easily have a pristine natural grass field all year in Southern California.The Arizona Cardinals play on real grass, and they have a state of the art stadium. I can't recall anyone complaining that they need fake turf there. The Redskins had to install fake turf this year because grass doesn't grow that well in January in DC (which lead to the mud field that RG3 tore his ACL on). I don't think that's a problem in LA though, seeing as how its about 65 degrees there right now.
So he's gonna introduce another soccer team to LA of which is going poorly? Now that sounds like good business. Supporting something that's in low demand is howhe became so rich. That's about as good of an idea as moving a team for a measly 2 billion dollars because he didn't want to pay a 500,000 dollar rental fee. BRILLIANT!!!!
What? The Galaxy arent doing poorly.