No they are saying taking him will finally get that type of WR. His first year would, if he was drafted, show a lot of potential with a good first year. Also if you're trying to say that a rookie year like that is unrealistic based on the guys you listed...if anything shows the exact opposite. I would love if Sammy would get drafted and have even a 800 yard performance.
How does it show the opposite? 800 yards is not #1 caliber numbers. Which was the point.
It's quite clear what your draft position is. I know it...trade down, if not take JC. I obviously disagree.
I would hope so, I've posted a lot about it.
My draft position is trade down, take Clowney if we're at #2 and then take Matthews in a trade down. If he's gone, take Watkins or Robinson. I don't have a strong preference between those two.
Brandon Gibson best season would get that production. Sammy Watkins (or any given rookie) his fist year getting that would be impressive and chances are would only get better after.
I wouldn't call it impressive. But it's certainly not poor either. And I would hope he'd get better. Frankly, though, I don't think Watkins will make or break 2014 as some(not you) claimed and I think there are other WRs in this draft that would contribute quite well to this team. So no...I wouldn't consider Watkins at #2.
IDK where your getting the "relying" part. No one is saying that. Again, it's getting a WR of his caliber. And for me it's not even that he's a "1" or a "2" or any other stupid label like that. It's his talent and production on the field that entices me. Including his 1st season.
That's simply not true. There are definitely people saying that.
He's a great prospect. But he's not elite. He's not Calvin or Fitz or AJ Green. I just don't think he's worth taking at #2. Nor do I think he immediately fixes our "issues" at WR.