Doesn't matter who we replace him with. He appeals to the owners' corporate agenda and even if they did fire him, they're going to replace him with another tool. If you wanna blame someone for putting a crappy product on the field, blame the owners. They reflect corporate America's way of handling business (harvesting short-term profits, it's like a man having a premature orgasm ruining it for his partner)
If you want to run a successful AND well-praised business, follow Germany and South Korea's business model by having the CEO or owners invest some of that wealth on improving the product on he field; the returns will be much higher and the infrastructure will be more stable if done so.
/endrant