ZigZagRam
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- May 12, 2014
- Messages
- 1,846
Not necessarily. Look at the other bad teams in the nlf who may have worse records than the rams (doubtful). Jaguars, Browns, Raiders, Redskins, Giants, etc. Now how many of those teams "need" a qb? Only the Giants might draft a qb in the 1st rd. All the others have drafted qb's in the 1st or 2nd and or have a backup who may start. If you look around the league how many teams really, really need a franchise qb who would move up? Houston? Arizona? Tampa Bay? I think we pick #1 overall anyway because I really dont see any team worse than the rams this year anyway. Top 5 pick guaranteed. Either way you dont compound the problem by doing what the redskins did. Rams are going to have their pick of at least 1of the top 2 qbs coming out next year so to me no trade.
Redskins may need a QB as well. Also, you have no clue who is going to finish below the Rams in the standings. You also have no clue who may trade up ahead of the Rams. Don't speak in absolutes about topics that even the brightest sports minds don't know. It's not going to go over well around here.
If any team is set up to make a Redskins-esque deal for an elite QB prospect, it's a team that's had 5 first rounders in the last three years.