Several recent on-field incidents have offered a reminder of the imbalance inherent in the NFL.
www.nytimes.com
By
Jourdan Rodrigue
Oct. 6, 2026
When I saw the video of NFL line judge Jeff Seeman directing
what appeared to be an angry profanity toward Arizona Cardinals tight end Trey McBride during Sunday’s game, my first reaction was shock. (Not because of the language; if you’re around football at all, you’re going to hear some language.)
Players and coaches argue with officials all the time — some coaches are notorious for it. Coaches and players can be flagged or otherwise penalized at that official’s discretion. How many times have we seen clips of a coach screaming at a sideline judge, headset askew and spittle spraying, before that official, stone-faced, throws a yellow flag into the air?
To see an official cursing at a player, though … that virtually never happens. Until it seems like it did.
Seeman has been suspended for two games, the NFL said on Monday. Another official, Adrian Hill, was also suspended for one game after a separate incident in Sunday’s Vikings-Dolphins game, during which Minnesota linebacker Eric Wilson appeared to accidentally run into Hill after a play. It looked like Wilson tried to help Hill up, and Hill reacted animatedly in response. A league source, who was granted anonymity because they were not cleared to speak publicly on the matter, specified that both suspensions are without pay. The league said both suspensions were for “an instance of unprofessional conduct,” on which point many would agree.
And sure, credit to the NFL for acting swiftly on the matter. But what else was the league going to do? The
video created accountability. You know, the thing the league makes sure the players face when it comes to officiating or even touchdown celebrations.
Is NFL officiating getting worse?
Mike Sando
My second thought, after seeing the video of McBride and Seeman, was:
What if there were no camera around to catch the incident? Would Seeman still be held accountable? Or would this just turn into another story swapped between players, coaches and officials — all of whom can speak to the intense emotions of a game, and the outbursts those emotions yield?
That camera forced the NFL to take a genuine look at a moment when the discrepancy between what the league allows for some, but prohibits for others, was on full display.
What You Should Read Next

NFL suspends 2 officials for conduct toward Cardinals’ Trey McBride, Vikings’ Eric Wilson
Line judge Jeff Seeman has been suspended two games and referee Adrian Hill one game for the incidents.
Players and coaches are fined by the NFL when they publicly criticize referees. If an organization disagrees or wants clarity from the league on certain calls, it has to submit them for review and response. That is the only course of action; it’s hardly a soothing one. It might make things worse, as in a notable case last week when Los Angeles Rams head coach Sean McVay said the league told him that, upon review, a
controversial pass interference call that held significant weight in a loss to the Denver Broncos
was actually incorrect. McVay was responding to a question posed by local reporters. The league’s own response? To share a not-so-subtle memo reminding clubs that such conversations between teams and officials are to remain confidential.
I.e., “we may have gotten it wrong, but don’t you dare talk about it.” And had McBride engaged in a hostile manner with the official (either to prompt the incident, or in response), he would likely be the one subject to an in-game or retroactive league penalty. (CBS sideline reporter
Aditi Kinkhabwala, who was standing nearby during the entire interaction, said that McBride did not curse at Seeman. The Cardinals declined to comment when asked about the sequence of events.)
In Minnesota, all Wilson could do was appear to try, and fail, to explain the innocent nature of the collision to Hill, and then walk away. On to the next play. The NFL’s system working as designed — by the NFL.
Officiating is a really difficult and brutally public part-time profession. The people who do it truly love it, because otherwise why subject themselves to the ire of at least one-half of a stadium each week? It is a human craft, and therefore inevitably flawed. And so I do believe there have to be some boundaries in place to protect officials from unnecessary criticism from fans and organizations; however, the players and coaches draw the short straw here when they can’t say
anything in disagreement.
This is the imbalanced system the league has installed: The referees officiate the games, the players and coaches don’t like some of their calls but can’t say so or change them and the NFL makes decisions for profit that make everyone’s jobs harder.
In September,
the league fined San Francisco 49ers fullback Kyle Juszczyk, Indianapolis Colts guard Matt Goncalves, Dallas Cowboys tight end Jake Ferguson and Denver Broncos guard Quinn Meinerz, among others, for their celebrations. The NFL’s code of conduct is collectively bargained with the NFL Players Association, but the nature of these supposed infractions stood out.
Meinerz said the fine came because he mimicked a dice roll, which the league called an illegal celebration. Juszczyk and Goncalves both celebrated by pretending to drink a beverage. Juszczyk, whose nickname is “Juice” and who has long celebrated by drinking out of an imaginary juice carton, said the league told him he was imitating drinking a beer — which he has denied. Goncalves didn’t deny the nature of his pretend beverage, but aptly noted that the NFL itself is partnered with Bud Light (and has been since 2011).
Kyle Juszczyk celebrates after scoring a touchdown against the Miami Dolphins in Week 2 of the 2026 season.Ezra Shaw / Getty Images
The NFL used words like “offensive demonstration” to categorize some of the gestures. This, despite profiting from its beer partnership. This, despite having commercial agreements with
multiple sportsbooks, each of which can say it is an “official sportsbook of the NFL.”
The league doesn’t want its players to hint at anything involving beer or gambling but instead to pantomime a perfect game, all while it crawls into bed with imperfect entities. It doesn’t want its officials criticized by players or coaches, even while it directly associates with a gambling industry that incites more pressure from the public than ever on them all.
Sunday, that sideline camera gave everyone a look at a small moment of inequity: what an official appeared to do when he thought nobody was looking, involving a player who wouldn’t be allowed to complain about it.
But it was just a reminder of the bigger system at work, one that goes beyond referees and fines and eventually broadens to every corner of the NFL. It’s a system that often says it wants to partner with players but can never authentically do so when it assigns them different standards from its own, then
actually partners with entities that reduce players to product.
Will the NFL ever offer to turn that camera on itself? Will it even care about what it might see?
Jourdan Rodrigue is a senior NFL writer for The Athletic. Previously, she covered the Los Angeles Rams for The Athletic, the Carolina Panthers for The Athletic and The Charlotte Observer, and Penn State football for the Centre Daily Times. She is an ASU grad, a recipient of the PFWA's Terez A. Paylor Emerging Writer award (2021) and the creator of "The Playcallers" and "Finding Rams" series.