Apparently my podcasts are the kiss of death. Whenever I talk a guy up, he ends up off the team.
Stay tuned for my next podcast where I speak in depth about the awesomeness of Jared Cook.
That is funny!

Apparently my podcasts are the kiss of death. Whenever I talk a guy up, he ends up off the team.
Stay tuned for my next podcast where I speak in depth about the awesomeness of Jared Cook.
As to this ^ point, someone else is still going to have to go because Watts hasn't come back yet! I am wondering who!
I was under the impression they brought Christian Bryant up.I don't think they've added anybody - whoever they added would just have been inactive for the Cardinals game anyway, with too little time to prepare. So unless I'm mistaken (and I've been wrong before) they still have a roster spot open for Watts. They just did it a few days early, because that was when the offer for getting something for the player they would have cut came.
I was under the impression they brought Christian Bryant up.
I believe Bryant took McGee's roster spot. There's one open right now.I was under the impression they brought Christian Bryant up.
But, despite all the talk about Cook and the WRs (yes there's room for improvement), I still wonder about Foles during plays when his first read isn't there.
I just rewatched the Steelers game...damn we were close. Austin and Britt were very good. Mason has some nice runs called back. Foles missed only a couple, but they were important. Hekker fails for the first time. I saw a Gurley play where the Steelers did everything right but the Rams o-line DID make a hole for him, closed by good D LB play, then Robinson or Brown literally landed on his man and Gurley was one cut from making a big play in that direction.
Misunderstood me. They are all safe. Number 54......should be a TV series.Gurley, Mason, and Cunningham are going nowhere for Watts. If that's the question, 100% it's Watts IMHO.
Not completely sold on Foles either. Maybe he gets better as the season goes and he is more familiar with the offense.
The Rams seem to be trying more zone blocking than many expected. That run with Gurley looked like a typical zone blocking cut back against the seem move. Was he told to do that? I think you are right that if he just stayed with the blocking he had a nice hole open up.
Did Gurley do a lot of cut back runs in college? Does Georgia use a zone blocking scheme? I know it can be very affective. That is why Shanahan always seemed to have a good running game and Eric Dickerson was great at the cut back. Is Gurley the reason for more zone blocking, despite not having a typical zone blocking Oline?
What is your take on that?There are far too many other issues on
this offense to call out Cook as the main culprit.
His overall drop % is not bad. In fact it was better than Bailey's last year if I recall. His lack of willingness to block IMO is grossly blown out of proportion. He is NOT, nor was he brought here to be, a conventional inline TE. I am not saying he is the prototype, perfect player for this team. But I think he is quickly becoming the new "whipping boy" of a struggling offense. There are far too many other issues on
this offense to call out Cook as the main culprit.
Cook's effort consistently pisses me off. I don't care if you're great at blocking. Act like you care. Cook makes a mistake or doesn't have something go his way early and then spends the rest of the game pouting and giving a crappy effort. It's infuriating to see a guy with that much ability half-ass it so often.
Quick was very, very, close to emerging as a #1 receiver when he got hurt. Even with a crap QB. We'll see what player he is tomorrow coming back, but I imagine he won't be featured that much anyway. A few big catches could go a long way though. Again we'll see. This injury could big a major setback for his development. Just have to pray not.
............................
I just rewatched the Steelers game...damn we were close. Austin and Britt were very good. Mason has some nice runs called back. Foles missed only a couple, but they were important. Hekker fails for the first time. I saw a Gurley play where the Steelers did everything right but the Rams o-line DID make a hole for him, closed by good D LB play, then Robinson or Brown literally landed on his man and Gurley was one cut from making a big play in that direction.
Do you think we see Quick this week? A healthy dose of Gurley?
I was referring to preseason this year, it looked like the only way we could get into the endzone is by a 60 yard bomb to Givens. And regular season comes, and we don't even put him on the field after he was our best WR in preseason.Because we scored a whole heck of a lot with him?
Getting plenty of targets sound like he is a good player. If he is good for another team then why is he not OK here?
I am all for replacing Cook. But I guess his few big games a year and no blocking are OK unlike Givens one big play a game that results in a TD.
Givens has actually done well when targeted and he looked very good in preseason and when he had a chance in the regular season.
Am I the only person at a complete lose as to the direction this team is trying to go?
.....
As far as Givens..... It apparently doesn't mean a thing to have flashes in the preseason performing against 3rd unit defenders who aren't in the league any more. They guy hasn't developed a lick since his "5 games of fame" his rookie year. And if you take away those 5 plays, he wasn't all that productive even in that season.
It seems pretty obvious to me anyway, that as soon as Quick got back in the mix, Givens became expendable.