Pointing out this relationship means I love Josh Freeman???Memphis come on man...whats with your love for all these bad QB's and QB's who don't have any real passing skills? You're killin' me![]()
Pointing out this relationship means I love Josh Freeman???Memphis come on man...whats with your love for all these bad QB's and QB's who don't have any real passing skills? You're killin' me![]()
Ehh no...but I've noticed that the majority of the QB's you support and would like to bring in aren't very good at passing the ball. Mostly run first guys who haven't had alot of success reading defenses and making decisions.Pointing out this relationship means I love Josh Freeman???
Ehh no...but I've noticed that the majority of the QB's you support and would like to bring in aren't very good at passing the ball. Mostly run first guys who haven't had alot of success reading defenses and making decisions.
Vince Young, Terrell Pryor, Nick Marshall, Josh Freeman just to name a few. Yuck!
Yes, but these days almost all ofenses have been mushed together. The man difference in WCO, Weiss-Earhart, and Coryell (3-digit) is terminology. Teams run the same plays as each other. Shotty uses Coryell terminology but the 3-digits are mostly gone. WCO calls routes by names but now they run routes in "concepts" like matching a slant with an out, or a post with a fade and the name those cominations.Do the packers still run the west coast offense? I'm thinking Bradford would be productive running that again.
Yes, but these days almost all ofenses have been mushed together. The man difference in WCO, Weiss-Earhart, and Coryell (3-digit) is terminology. Teams run the same plays as each other. Shotty uses Coryell terminology but the 3-digits are mostly gone. WCO calls routes by names but now they run routes in "concepts" like matching a slant with an out, or a post with a fade and the name those cominations.
In the Martz system we had "Twins right ace right 999 h-ballon", a similar call in the Weiss playbooks would be "Zero out all-go snow."
Same play, different terminology.
Bingo. I might be in minority but I would give Freeman a chance just like we gave Britt a chance but only if we get van peltActually, I didn't support Josh Freeman (which was my point). But, I wouldn't mind seeing him get another chance as he did throw 25 TD passes vs. 6 INTs in 2010. And 27 TDs vs. 17 INTs in 2012 (Which is something Bradford hasn't even done, btw).
Young, Pryor, Marshall? I guess I strongly agree with Mike Holmgren who says that backup QBs should be able to do something with their feet given the limited amount of reps they get during the week/season.
That said, unlike yourself and others, I'm not tied down to this traditional QB model which calls for this quality traditional drop back passer that perhaps 1/3 of the league typically gets to have at one time. Due to this scarcity of talent, I'm open to new ideas in regards to scoring (see Auburn post) as I've watched questionable passers like McNair, McNabb, Vick, and Kaepernick have success in this league. All it takes is a creative mind.
BTW, most young QBs entering the league struggle to read defenses, initially.