Rams Re-sign Kendricks

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
V3 said:
Too much, IMO. His blocking didn't look as good last year and I personally think his hands are overrated(they're okay, just not amazing like some say).
Click to expand...

Hmmmm, well then I would like to here your opinion of Cook and his hands in relation to his salary...
 
  • Like
Reactions: shovelpass
8to12 said:
Hmmmm, well then I would like to here your opinion of Cook and his hands in relation to his salary...
Click to expand...
Said at the time of his signing that it was way too much. More specifically, I said his guaranteed money was way too much. At least I can say Cook gets us some yards.
 
Nice! He didn't end up with the Patriots. The fact we retained him says a lot about Fisher, Snead and Demoff...
 
Memphis Ram said:
Unless the plan is to get rid of Cook or this deal is heavily backloaded, this contract makes no sense whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Getting rid of Cook would actually hurt our Cap so I highly doubt that we are releasing Cook. We are actually probably stuck with him until his contract ends.
 
I love me some Lebron Lance Kendricks James.

I'll never forget that 80 yard TD he had in Tampon at the beginning of the 2nd half a year or so ago. He silenced that crowd and sent them heading for their cars very early that day. Very satisfying for me btw.

He looks just like Lebron. You know it's true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barrison
Not a fan of this move. Out of our top 3 free agents (Britt, Barksdale, Kendricks), LK is easily the most expendable. Harkey is ready to step up. The young guns—Bayer & Cunningham—are ready to step up too.

We save $11mm by getting rid of Bradford. If the #'s on the Kendricks deal are accurate, then we're using almost half of that saved $$$ on a TE who's really not that valuable. He's an OK blocker and catches a few passes... so what? Is it really hard to replace that?

We could have re-signed Barksdale for that price (or something around that price). Maybe we still will. I just think the money would've been better spent elsewhere. We really need to fix this o-line. Kendricks is no game changer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatbot and brokeu91
StevenG-BR said:
Not a fan of this move. Out of our top 3 free agents (Britt, Barksdale, Kendricks), LK is easily the most expendable. Harkey is ready to step up. The young guns—Bayer & Cunningham—are ready to step up too.

We save $11mm by getting rid of Bradford. If the #'s on the Kendricks deal are accurate, then we're using almost half of that saved $$$ on a TE who's really not that valuable. He's an OK blocker and catches a few passes... so what? Is it really hard to replace that?

We could have re-signed Barksdale for that price (or something around that price). Maybe we still will. I just think the money would've been better spent elsewhere. We really need to fix this o-line. Kendricks is no game changer.
Click to expand...
i don't think Kendricks has been given enough of a chance honestly. Schotty was a moron. I thought kendricks was improving and I think Snisher thinks so too with a teak to the offense with Foles that could be why he was resigned idk. So Cook will get his money and be gone in another year I think and Kendricks they hope is the long term starter with Harkey.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back