The freak?? Overachieve has such a negative connotation to it, at least when I hear it.
1st thing...Robert Quinn overachieved based on the merits of what he did in college and his benign tumor? No, that doesn't make it validated. You can't simply just say, he's becoming a star? Is that so freakin hard to do?
Second, he mentions Joe Barksdale overachieved, but his reasoning is b/c of that, the OL is now a strength? When I hear overachieve, I think that the season is a fluke, and he'll become an average or below average player the following year.
Which leads me to Johnny Hekker, how the hell does one overachieve for 2 seasons? Like Robert Quinn, it's easier to say he's becoming a star. Even at punter.
Then his conclusion his these guys will become cornerstones?
Basically, this article makes no sense. It's a negative connotation that's supposed to be made positive.