What about all those other times he was on the field and didn't show any dominance? I'm always extremely leery of players who have one good year after years of less than stellar play. How many times have we seen that?
I hope you're right though. Only if we sign him of course. :coffee:
Here's the thing, though. What less than stellar play? He was a very good starter for the Panthers, very good in limited time with the Vikings, and then of course, very, very good for the Chiefs last year. The only reason that play hasn't turned into a contract for him yet is because he had a bad hip injury his last year with the Panthers, never got enough PT to prove himself with the Vikings, and his time with the Chiefs leads us to well.. now.
I could understand if you're talking about Laurent Robinson who was a sucky receiver for the Rams, then had one good year with the Cowboys, that's a scary Free Agent prospect because you don't know which guy you're going to get. It's not the same thing with a guy who essentially has nothing but relatively good tape out there from what I've heard from everyone who's watched him play extensively.