View: https://x.com/i/status/2024870134502810070
Yeah there are other factors at play here but still impressive.
League average success on a run on 3rd and 3 or less is 35%-45%, FWIW (per nextgen and PFF).The way I gauge a team's run game is what they do on third and short. Do you have a good chance to convert a 3rd and 3 for example.
The way I gauge a team's run game is what they do on third and short. Do you have a good chance to convert a 3rd and 3 for example.
What this doesn't tell us is the run success rate on 3rd and 3. It's a little surprising to me they only ran 32% of the time in those situations.League average success on a run on 3rd and 3 or less is 35%-45%, FWIW (per nextgen and PFF).
Rams conversion rate on 3rd and 3 or less was 52.6% including both run and pass and Rams passed on 68% of those times. Given that it's more successful to pass than run on 3rd and less (50%-60% success rate league wide), one would expect most teams to pass in those situations.
But with the Rams only having a 52.6% success rate on that down and distance (think top short yardage teams were closer to 60%), the Rams have some area of improvement that could be made there though the statistics may be skewered due to how much fewer attempts the Rams made in the down and distance since they were so good at picking up 1st downs before getting to 3rd down this year.
Sounds about right and I never felt confident in that most important situation. Felt like we had a lot of drives stall out when we tried to move the chains on the ground.What this doesn't tell us is the run success rate on 3rd and 3. It's a little surprising to me they only ran 32% of the time in those situations.
True, I scoured for that info and couldn't findWhat this doesn't tell us is the run success rate on 3rd and 3. It's a little surprising to me they only ran 32% of the time in those situations.
They would have a superior OL for 2026. But replacing two starting OGs after the season is risky for future years.Then they would have a superior OL across the board. And would only need to replace two OGs after the season.
Well...I would say many times it was a bad playcall. How many times did we see McVay run inside where the defense is stacked? It boggled my mind!!!Sounds about right and I never felt confident in that most important situation. Felt like we had a lot of drives stall out when we tried to move the chains on the ground.
Either way if I had to describe our run game I'd call it a "high success rate on early downs when defenses are worried about the pass" type operation. And the problem seemed to be penetration into the backfield on too many snaps.
This is why I keep wondering if the Rams are going to zig when we're zagging again by perhaps reloading this OL with some fresh blood in this offseason and next. Or are they going to just sign and extend everyone and be happy with what they had. I think this year's OL was good enough in protections, which with a McVay offense tends to be the primary consideration. But when you think about it, McVay has dealt with a non-optimal OL just about every year he's been in charge. Not once has he had what I would call an elite line.
And that's ok, again, if the protections are there, because he is among the best at WCO'ing an opposing defense to move the chains with schemed up completions or Stafford opening up the defense with his eyes. But is that good enough for him or does he maybe want more from his line. The secondary is going to be the priority this offseason, however there is room for them to do some tooling on that front if they so choose.
Draft one midrounds this year. Then a higher round selection next offseason.They would have a superior OL for 2026. But replacing two starting OGs after the season is risky for future years.
Fans wouldn't say anything if the OL opened a seam and the RB hit it for big yards. But on any play that does not work, which often is simply due to one or more players being beaten by their man on their assignment, fans will decide that the play call was stupid or bad and vent their frustrations via that mental outlet.Well...I would say many times it was a bad playcall. How many times did we see McVay run inside where the defense is stacked? It boggled my mind!!!
Avila and Dotson are integral to this OL it's too risky to attempt replacing them imoWell if the Rams were to do the following:
1. Cut Shelton and Sign Linderbaum.
2. Extend Dotson.
3. Tell Avila he's gonna play out his contract in 2026.
4. Let McClendon walk in FA.
Then they would need to draft a RT, which is risky.
But if they were to:
1. Cut Shelton and Sign Linderbaum.
2. Sign McClendon.
3. Tell Avila and Dotson they'll play out their contracts in 2026.
Then they would have a superior OL across the board. And would only need to replace two OGs after the season.
And the new, elite 25 year old Center would be there to bring a new QB along if Stafford retires after hoisting his second Lombardi.