Rams and Stafford Agree on Extension
- Thread starter IowaRam
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
I wasn't comparing QBs, just commenting that AR with two current MVPs was able to get what I believe is the highest annual salary for a QB.
And for your balls, we have a lovely spring mist of lavender, sandalwood, and goat droppings, with a touch of eucalyptus. It invigorates the balls, refreshes the sack, and makes you remember you have a taint.
I get it. You just reminded to compare them. After this season, matt will have a noticeable lead.
Cant compare to Rodgers or Watson, as they were essentially on the open market.
Rodgers was under contract.
Watson is the outlier because he's only 26.
I’m having a felling in 10 years Stafford will be viewed as the greatest Ram QB ever by Rams fans and it won’t even be close.
Things like this coupled with championships propel you into another category all together.
Things like this coupled with championships propel you into another category all together.
I will never use l___ g_ for that very reason…tb can kiss my hairy ass
They were both under contract, but potentially available. Rodgers agreed to play in 21 but would retire if they didnt trade him. I'm sure you recall the story.. Watson had the no trade clause so was able to negotiate with potential suitors
Neither was a free agent per se, but both had all the leverage of a free agent and then some
Stafford is/was in a totally different spot.
Glad its all signed and can move on, but for the sake of comparisons, his extension is apples to oranges with Rodgers/Watson
I know everyone is all hunky dory that Staff is signed and sealed, as am I. But this "he took less to build" crap is just a bunch of malarkey and media fodder.
Stafford had a very bit as much leverage as Rodgers.
Expiring contract… SB winner who tore up the playoffs and is 3 years younger.
Except the part where he probably could’ve pushed for more.
No he didnt.
Had a year left, could have been franchise tagged.
Rodgers line was in the sand that he was requesting a trade, unless....
You seriously cant debate this, just read any of the 100 or so pages of Aaron Rodgers saga. If not for the gazillion dollar contract, he would have had to be traded
Rodgers had one year left too, they were both free agents after 2022. And yes Stafford took less sorry to burst your bubble he easily could have gotten as much as Watson.
Dude.. franchising means the entire value on that year’s cap.
Also.. do you think he plays under that?
You’re talking about attitude, not actual leverage.
Stafford could’ve pulled the same diva shit.
Yeah, media fodder. Make the guy a hero for "settling" for 43 mill per year....
Gimme a break
You’re confusing societal value with NFL value.