Let me think of how to put this. They weren't for a change so freak 'em.
One of these days, these freakin refs might call a good game and figure out that we are not watching to see them throw flags. Until then, I will take any game where they don't flat out screw us. And I'll tell you Jrry, after rewatching that game a few times, there were holding calls that could have been made on both sides of the ball, the refs missed the call on Dick at the end of the game that could have been huge and made the fake punt and the fumble non-existent. And speaking of the fumble, there is NOTHING that shows Sherman controlling the ball - only three refs digging to the bottom of the pile as they always do and one ref taking the ball from Harkey's hands and signaling Ram ball. In the replay you can actually see Harkey's hand under Sherman pulling the ball away from under Dick's dick. There is NO reason for a review and I'm pretty sure they couldn't review that anyway with the scrum that ensued. It's not like the Bowman play where he was by himself with clear possession of the ball before it was knocked out.
So where did you see a discrepancy? What kinds of plays did you see the refs calling in favor of the Rams. Because I didn't see it even when rewatching on coaches film and regular action.
I don't generally get angry at the bulk of calls unless there is an obvious one sidedness to them. What I get pissed about is obvious game changing penalties or missed calls. And in that game, Seattle actually has nothing to be angry about.