Prime, this still doesn't explain why other teams are successful including the seachickens who's receivers are not H-O- Famers. Let's be honest, there's either a lack of talent or a lack of planning and scheming involved here. The Rams have had ample time to select receivers capable of getting separation. Let's face it, this isn't about HoF players, instead it's about planning, O strategy and coaching. There are 32 teams out there and at least half of them put up more points and yards than do the Rams.
Perhaps improvements to the O line will finally make the difference, but other than more time in the pocket for Bradford, I'm still not convinced that the Rams receiving corp's has the "goods." I think Tavon has the ability, but will his size keep him on the injured list? We know that Givens has the speed, but can he become more than a one trick pony? Quick has been a bust and if I were Fisher, I'd cut him if he doesn't drastically improve this season. As for Pettis, we know his role and it ain't HoFamer material. Perhaps Bailey will shine, but like so many of the Rams receivers, height and size isn't exactly a strength is it?
And to beat a dead horse, again I ask; who is the "go to guy"......and to those who suggest that a #1 receiver or "go to guy" isn't necessary, I've still got that bridge, if you're interested.